| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Consumer electronics are costed down to the lowest possible level. If
they can use something cheaper, they WILL use something cheaper. A TV Well, maybe. Any manufacturer who has been nailed with thousands of dollars in warranty costs caused by saving a penny might disagree with your statement. I've seen it happen. Caused by bad engineering (or purchasing), I would say. "Costing down" does not mean "making inappropriate component substitutions", and I wasn't suggesting or advocating such a policy. It means, quite simply, going over the circuit and seeing where a cheaper design or a cheaper, _compatible_ substitute can be used. If the device has a 12 month warranty, and it dies after that period expires, then nobody really cares which component was the first to fail. Especially in disposable consumer electronics! |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
| Electrolytic caps question | Homebrew | |||
| Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
| Electrolytic caps question | Equipment | |||
| Electrolytic caps question | Homebrew | |||