Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
meter sensitivity versus internal resistance
Is there a simple relationship between a meters internal resistance and its
sensitivity (ohms per volt). Maybe this is trivial but I don't see it. Uwe |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Uwe Langmesser wrote:
Is there a simple relationship between a meters internal resistance and its sensitivity (ohms per volt). Maybe this is trivial but I don't see it. Uwe The higher the resistance, the lower the operating current, but there is no simple formula. You need a current limiting resistor in series with the meter, and a known supply voltage. Start at the maximum resistance, and slowly reduce it till you have a full scale deflection. Disconnect the voltage, then measure the total resistance of the meter and adjustable resistor. Then use Ohm's law to determine the meter's sensitivity. Its simple and only takes a couple minutes to test. Use a low voltage, and it is a good idea to have different variable resistors to put in series. Start with a higher value resistor than you think you need, so you don't damage the meter, and work your way down. I use an expensive, six decade resistor with an adjustable regulated power supply. I can adjust the resistance in steps, from zero ohms to one megohm in one ohm steps. -- We now return you to our normally scheduled programming. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Uwe Langmesser wrote:
Is there a simple relationship between a meters internal resistance and its sensitivity (ohms per volt). Maybe this is trivial but I don't see it. Uwe The higher the resistance, the lower the operating current, but there is no simple formula. You need a current limiting resistor in series with the meter, and a known supply voltage. Start at the maximum resistance, and slowly reduce it till you have a full scale deflection. Disconnect the voltage, then measure the total resistance of the meter and adjustable resistor. Then use Ohm's law to determine the meter's sensitivity. Its simple and only takes a couple minutes to test. Use a low voltage, and it is a good idea to have different variable resistors to put in series. Start with a higher value resistor than you think you need, so you don't damage the meter, and work your way down. I use an expensive, six decade resistor with an adjustable regulated power supply. I can adjust the resistance in steps, from zero ohms to one megohm in one ohm steps. -- We now return you to our normally scheduled programming. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Uwe Langmesser wrote: Is there a simple relationship between a meters internal resistance and its sensitivity (ohms per volt). ============================ Yes. Couldn't be more simple. It is the internal resistance of the meter divided by the voltage range the meter is set to. When the meter is at full-scale deflection the current flowing through the meter is always (Voltage Range) / (Ohms per Volt). The internal resistance of the meter, on any voltage range, is the resistance of the moving coil plus the series meter-multiplying resistance. --- Reg, G4FGQ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Uwe Langmesser wrote: Is there a simple relationship between a meters internal resistance and its sensitivity (ohms per volt). ============================ Yes. Couldn't be more simple. It is the internal resistance of the meter divided by the voltage range the meter is set to. When the meter is at full-scale deflection the current flowing through the meter is always (Voltage Range) / (Ohms per Volt). The internal resistance of the meter, on any voltage range, is the resistance of the moving coil plus the series meter-multiplying resistance. --- Reg, G4FGQ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
See URL:
http://www.tpub.com/neets/book16/68e.htm Too lengthy to repeat here -- but gives the full explanation -- Incognito By Necessity (:-( If you can't convince them, confuse them. - - -Harry S Truman "Uwe Langmesser" wrote in message ... Is there a simple relationship between a meters internal resistance and its sensitivity (ohms per volt). Maybe this is trivial but I don't see it. Uwe |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
See URL:
http://www.tpub.com/neets/book16/68e.htm Too lengthy to repeat here -- but gives the full explanation -- Incognito By Necessity (:-( If you can't convince them, confuse them. - - -Harry S Truman "Uwe Langmesser" wrote in message ... Is there a simple relationship between a meters internal resistance and its sensitivity (ohms per volt). Maybe this is trivial but I don't see it. Uwe |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Uwe Langmesser wrote in message ...
Is there a simple relationship between a meters internal resistance and its sensitivity (ohms per volt). No. Maybe this is trivial but I don't see it. Not trivial at all. The internal resistance of a meter depends on the type of meter (D'Arsonval, moving iron, electrodynamometer, etc.) and its design. As a simple example, imagine two identical 0-1 mA D'Arsonval meters. Now replace the springs in one of the meters with new ones that require more force. The meter with the "stronger" springs will need more current for fullscale deflection even though it has the same internal resistance. --- There *is* a relationship between a milliammeter's fullscale reading and the ohms-per-volt when it is used with a series resistor to make a voltmeter. Ohms-per-volt = 1/current for full scale deflection (in amps) So, when used with the appropriate series resistor(s): a 0-1 mA meter will give 1000 ohms-per-volt a 0-100 uA meter will give 10,000 ohms-per-volt a 0-50 uA meter will give 20,000 ohms-per-volt etc. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Uwe Langmesser wrote in message ...
Is there a simple relationship between a meters internal resistance and its sensitivity (ohms per volt). No. Maybe this is trivial but I don't see it. Not trivial at all. The internal resistance of a meter depends on the type of meter (D'Arsonval, moving iron, electrodynamometer, etc.) and its design. As a simple example, imagine two identical 0-1 mA D'Arsonval meters. Now replace the springs in one of the meters with new ones that require more force. The meter with the "stronger" springs will need more current for fullscale deflection even though it has the same internal resistance. --- There *is* a relationship between a milliammeter's fullscale reading and the ohms-per-volt when it is used with a series resistor to make a voltmeter. Ohms-per-volt = 1/current for full scale deflection (in amps) So, when used with the appropriate series resistor(s): a 0-1 mA meter will give 1000 ohms-per-volt a 0-100 uA meter will give 10,000 ohms-per-volt a 0-50 uA meter will give 20,000 ohms-per-volt etc. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Think "Ohm's Law." The meter movement responds to a current. To read
voltage, you put a resistor in series with the meter movement so that V(full scale) = R(total)*I(meter, full scale). R(total) is the sum of the meter's internal resistance and the external series resistor. So a 1mA meter movement always gives 1kohms/volt, and a 20uA meter movement gives 50kohms/volt. Cheers, Tom Uwe Langmesser wrote in message ... Is there a simple relationship between a meters internal resistance and its sensitivity (ohms per volt). Maybe this is trivial but I don't see it. Uwe |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
max power transfer theorem | Antenna | |||
Radiation Resistance & Efficiency | Antenna | |||
Internal Resistance (?) | Antenna |