Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 15th 04, 02:41 PM
A.N. Onym
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Er...
Well. After a couple of Years, the resistance of the coil roller contacts
reaches
"irritating" high values, destroying coil Q.
Keep it clean! (tomato ketchup is a good cleaner!)



Reg Edwards wrote:

Ian,

Quite rightly, you blame the melt down of the tuner not to the tuner's
intrinsic inefficiency (which none of them have) but to the abuse inflicted
on it by the user with the help of a transmitter.

All tuners are high-efficiency devices when operated within their ratings.
They can't help being otherwise. They have only a length of wire in the form
of a coil and a condenser.
---
Reg.


  #12   Report Post  
Old March 19th 04, 12:20 PM
Jan-Martin Noeding, LA8AK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:41:23 +0100, "A.N. Onym"
wrote:

Er...
Well. After a couple of Years, the resistance of the coil roller contacts
reaches
"irritating" high values, destroying coil Q.
Keep it clean! (tomato ketchup is a good cleaner!)



Reg Edwards wrote:

Ian,

Quite rightly, you blame the melt down of the tuner not to the tuner's
intrinsic inefficiency (which none of them have) but to the abuse inflicted
on it by the user with the help of a transmitter.

All tuners are high-efficiency devices when operated within their ratings.
They can't help being otherwise. They have only a length of wire in the form
of a coil and a condenser.
---
Reg.


Reg is right, because those roller coils are particluarly popular on
the opposite side of the atlantic ocean. Those rollers are usually
only optimum on the lowest frequencies and efficiency decreases when
you use a smaller part of the coil

----
Jan-Martin, LA8AK, N-4623 Kristiansand
http://home.online.no/~la8ak/
  #13   Report Post  
Old March 19th 04, 12:20 PM
Jan-Martin Noeding, LA8AK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:41:23 +0100, "A.N. Onym"
wrote:

Er...
Well. After a couple of Years, the resistance of the coil roller contacts
reaches
"irritating" high values, destroying coil Q.
Keep it clean! (tomato ketchup is a good cleaner!)



Reg Edwards wrote:

Ian,

Quite rightly, you blame the melt down of the tuner not to the tuner's
intrinsic inefficiency (which none of them have) but to the abuse inflicted
on it by the user with the help of a transmitter.

All tuners are high-efficiency devices when operated within their ratings.
They can't help being otherwise. They have only a length of wire in the form
of a coil and a condenser.
---
Reg.


Reg is right, because those roller coils are particluarly popular on
the opposite side of the atlantic ocean. Those rollers are usually
only optimum on the lowest frequencies and efficiency decreases when
you use a smaller part of the coil

----
Jan-Martin, LA8AK, N-4623 Kristiansand
http://home.online.no/~la8ak/
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question running balanced line [email protected] Antenna 22 December 8th 04 02:02 AM
MFJ-974H Balanced Line Tuner Ed Antenna 18 November 14th 03 05:11 PM
Balanced Tuner for Balanced Antennas? Alan P. Biddle Antenna 10 October 29th 03 02:08 AM
Adjustment of simple balanced tuner Edward A. Feustel Antenna 1 October 17th 03 03:02 PM
Complex line Z0: A numerical example Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 September 13th 03 01:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017