Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:56:10 +0000, Paul Burridge
posted this: Hi all, Is there some black magic required to get higher order harmonics out of an oscillator? I'm only trying to get 17.2Mhz out of a 3.44Mhz source and am thus far failing spectacularly. I've tried everything I can think of so far to no avail. Is this a simulated circuit or a "real" one built with "real" components? I have at least one suggestion, but I need to know whether to send an LTspice netlist or a gif. Jim |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Firstly, thanks to everyone who's responded to this question. I've had plenty of valuable leads to follow up on, for which I am as ever very grateful. On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:16:28 GMT, James Meyer wrote: Is this a simulated circuit or a "real" one built with "real" components? It *is* actually a real one in this instance! Although I've simulated it as well, of course, but that hasn't provided any clues as to what might be causing the problem with the actual circuit. I have at least one suggestion, but I need to know whether to send an LTspice netlist or a gif. Send 'em both! -- The BBC: Licensed at public expense to spread lies. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 11:50:12 +0000, Paul Burridge
posted this: I have at least one suggestion, but I need to know whether to send an LTspice netlist or a gif. Send 'em both! I'm still working on an LTspice version of a varactor multiplier using the base-emitter junction of a class C amp as the varactor. Basically using an "idler" tank or tanks to augment the fifth harmonic. The other idea is to make a doubler and a trippler fed from the fundamental and then feed them into a mixer to get the fifth. If the doubler and trippler are active (class C) stages, you should get as many db out at the higher frequency as you put in at the fundamental. The mixer can have gain too. Three transistors, three tuned circuits, and Bob's yer uncle. Jim |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:51:50 GMT, James Meyer
wrote: On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 11:50:12 +0000, Paul Burridge posted this: I have at least one suggestion, but I need to know whether to send an LTspice netlist or a gif. Send 'em both! I'm still working on an LTspice version of a varactor multiplier using the base-emitter junction of a class C amp as the varactor. Basically using an "idler" tank or tanks to augment the fifth harmonic. The other idea is to make a doubler and a trippler fed from the fundamental and then feed them into a mixer to get the fifth. If the doubler and trippler are active (class C) stages, you should get as many db out at the higher frequency as you put in at the fundamental. The mixer can have gain too. Three transistors, three tuned circuits, and Bob's yer uncle. Jim Why not just bandpass filter the 5th from the square wave? Too simple? John |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:04:18 -0800, John Larkin
wrote: Why not just bandpass filter the 5th from the square wave? Too simple? I suggested this a while ago, but no one seemed very keen on that solution for some reason. Pity, as it does seem to Spice very well. A 5/6V TTL level square wave winds up as around .5 of a volt of 5th harmonic, post-filtering. Not bad! -- The BBC: Licensed at public expense to spread lies. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:27:21 +0000, Paul Burridge
wrote: On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:04:18 -0800, John Larkin wrote: Why not just bandpass filter the 5th from the square wave? Too simple? I suggested this a while ago, but no one seemed very keen on that solution for some reason. Write down their names for me please, so I can remember to not hire them. John |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin jjlarkin@highSNIPland
THIStechPLEASEnology.com wrote (in qvrb50hvn0t1nj7kq5cako00bjrtis7nnr@ 4ax.com) about 'Extracting the 5th Harmonic', on Mon, 15 Mar 2004: On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:27:21 +0000, Paul Burridge wrote: On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:04:18 -0800, John Larkin wrote: Why not just bandpass filter the 5th from the square wave? Too simple? I suggested this a while ago, but no one seemed very keen on that solution for some reason. Write down their names for me please, so I can remember to not hire them. The reason no-one seemed keen is that the OP's **complaint** was that his 5th harmonic BP filter didn't produce any output. I think we have to supplement 'Read The Fascinating Manual' with 'RTCT' - 'Read The Copulating Thread'. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin jjlarkin@highSNIPland
THIStechPLEASEnology.com wrote (in qvrb50hvn0t1nj7kq5cako00bjrtis7nnr@ 4ax.com) about 'Extracting the 5th Harmonic', on Mon, 15 Mar 2004: On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:27:21 +0000, Paul Burridge wrote: On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:04:18 -0800, John Larkin wrote: Why not just bandpass filter the 5th from the square wave? Too simple? I suggested this a while ago, but no one seemed very keen on that solution for some reason. Write down their names for me please, so I can remember to not hire them. The reason no-one seemed keen is that the OP's **complaint** was that his 5th harmonic BP filter didn't produce any output. I think we have to supplement 'Read The Fascinating Manual' with 'RTCT' - 'Read The Copulating Thread'. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:27:21 +0000, Paul Burridge
wrote: On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:04:18 -0800, John Larkin wrote: Why not just bandpass filter the 5th from the square wave? Too simple? I suggested this a while ago, but no one seemed very keen on that solution for some reason. Write down their names for me please, so I can remember to not hire them. John |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:04:18 -0800, John Larkin
posted this: On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:51:50 GMT, James Meyer wrote: The other idea is to make a doubler and a trippler fed from the fundamental and then feed them into a mixer to get the fifth. If the doubler and trippler are active (class C) stages, you should get as many db out at the higher frequency as you put in at the fundamental. The mixer can have gain too. Three transistors, three tuned circuits, and Bob's yer uncle. Jim Why not just bandpass filter the 5th from the square wave? Too simple? John Because a square wave has to have a particular on to off ratio to get enough fifth. Because a square wave needs those nasty logic gates. Because three transistors are simpler. Jim |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Shorted 1/4 wave stub ? | Antenna | |||
A Simple Harmonic Generator. | Antenna | |||
Frequency multiplication | Homebrew |