In This Power Play,
High-Wire Act Riles
Ham-Radio Fans

New Use for Lines Sparks
Tension With Operators;
'Firestorm' in Penn Yan
By KEN BROWN
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
March 23, 2004; Page A1

Rick Lindquist drove down a street in a New York City suburb, ignoring the
snow swirling around his car and twirling the dial on the ham radio mounted
to the side of his dashboard. The radio picked up an operator in Minnesota
discussing antennas, the Salvation Army's daily emergency network check and
then the time, as broadcast from Colorado by the National Institute of
Standards and Technology.

As the car turned onto North State Road in the village of Briarcliff Manor
in Westchester County, the voices faded, replaced with whirs and wahs --
what could have been sound effects from a 1950s science-fiction movie. The
source, according to Mr. Lindquist, was right outside the window: the power
lines running alongside the road.

Owned by Consolidated Edison, the lines transmit not just electricity but
data, much like phone and cable-TV wires. The utility is testing a system
for reading meters, probing for outages and potentially offering high-speed
Internet access to its customers via their electrical outlets. The
interference from the power lines "ranges from very annoying to
that's-all-I-can-hear," contends Mr. Lindquist, 58 years old, who often taps
out Morse-code messages as he drives.

In a clash between the dots and dashes of the telegraph and the bits and
bytes of the Web, the nation's vocal but shrinking population of ham-radio
operators, or "hams" as they call themselves, are stirring up a war with the
utility industry over new power-line communications. Hams have flooded the
Federal Communications Commission with about 2,500 letters and e-mails
opposing power-line trials. In a letter to the FCC, the American Radio Relay
League, a ham-radio group with 160,000 members, called power-line
communications "a Pandora's box of unprecedented proportions."


The league has raised more than $300,000 from nearly 5,600 donors since last
summer, to pay for testing, lobbying and publicity to spread the word about
the perceived threat. A half-dozen hams even confronted FCC Chairman Michael
Powell, a big advocate of the power-line technology, when he visited a test
site near Raleigh, N.C., earlier this month.

The problem, most ham operators contend, is that power lines weren't built
to carry anything other than electricity. Telephone and cable-TV lines are
either shielded with a second set of wires or twisted together to prevent
their signals from interfering with other transmissions. But signals sent
over electrical wires tend to spill out, the hams contend.

The FCC and the utilities say new technologies have eliminated the
interference and accuse the hams of exploiting the issue for their own
gains. "We haven't seen the sun darken and everything electrical turn to
white noise and haze during a deployment," says Matt Oja, an executive at
Progress Energy, whose test Mr. Powell visited. "This is a fairly vocal
group that has been whipped into a frenzy by their organization."

The controversy comes at a sensitive time for the hams. Not too many decades
ago, ham-radio operators were on the cutting edge of communications
technology. They chatted with people in far-flung places at a time when
long-distance calling was still a luxury. They spread word of disasters that
otherwise might have taken days to reach the public. In the age of e-mail,
wireless Internet access and cellphones that double as walkie-talkies, many
operators worry that their hobby will fade away.

To become a fully licensed ham operator, people still need to learn Morse
code, though that requirement likely will be dropped soon after more than a
decade of debate. Aging hams, who built crystal radio sets as kids or were
radio operators during World War II, are dying. Fewer youngsters are
replacing them. Armed with powerful computers, today's young tinkerers grow
up to be tech geeks, playing videogames and writing software.

The American Radio Relay League has seen its membership shrink to today's
160,000 from a peak of 175,000 in 1995, and the average member is in his
mid-50s. The group estimates that there are about 250,000 active ham-radio
enthusiasts.

Hams always have been a quirky bunch. They haunt a series of short-wave
radio frequencies set aside for them by the federal government in the 1930s.
Other slices of the spectrum are reserved for AM and FM radio, broadcast
television, cellphones, and police and fire departments, among other uses.

Hams take great pride in radioing around the world. One favorite game:
trying to contact someone in each of the 3,000-plus counties in the U.S. Mr.
Lindquist is so enthusiastic about ham radio that he vacations in spots such
as Whitehorse, the capital of Canada's Yukon Territory, so other hams can
claim they made contact with that city.

Ed Thomas, the FCC's chief engineer, says the commission has spent a year
listening to the hams' concerns about power lines and is getting frustrated.
"Why is this thing a major calamity?" he says. "And honestly, I'd love the
answer to that."

Companies such as Con Ed and Progress note that current FCC regulations call
for systems to be shut down if they interfere with hams. The radio operators
agree the rules are clear, but they fear they will be rescinded or not
enforced.

Con Ed says its system in Briarcliff Manor doesn't interfere with the hams
and maintains that, in two years of testing, it hasn't received one
complaint. But the American Radio Relay League says it did mention this
system in its letters to the FCC, and it has been complaining about it on
its Web site.

The hams have been quick to act wherever systems are being rolled out. Just
days after Penn Yan, a town of 5,200 that sits amid New York's Finger Lakes,
approved a plan to test power-line Internet access, "the firestorm started
with the ham-radio operators -- letters, e-mails, telephone calls saying,
'You can't do this,' " recalls Mayor Doug Marchionda Jr.

Hoping to keep everyone happy, he approached David Simmons, a local ham and
owner of an electronics store that sells radio gear. They surveyed the town
before the trial began to get base readings of interference. They even
pinpointed a spot that had bothered police and firefighters for years,
tracing it to refrigerators at a local supermarket.

With the refrigerators fixed and the power-line system in place over nine
blocks of Penn Yan, Mr. Simmons is satisfied that there is no interference
and now favors the new technology. "This thing has caught quite a buzz," he
says. "It's just so much negativity out there."

Tom Gius, a ham-radio operator in Alpine, Texas, sees the power lines as a
threat to the public services that hams provide. When hailstorms sweep
through each spring, Mr. Gius heads to the local radio station, while other
hams fan out to the north, south, east and west. They communicate by radio,
and Mr. Gius passes information to the radio station. "We won't be able to
understand each other, it'll be so noisy," frets Mr. Gius, a 60-year-old
retired broadcaster.

Write to Ken Brown at

Intentional or not, the article makes ham radio sound pathetic and
antiquated. I'm starting to wonder if the ARRL is making much ado about
nothing in order to collect money from a dwindling membership.
Bob
kb8tl at yahoo dot com

Intentional or not, the article makes ham radio sound pathetic and
antiquated. I'm starting to wonder if the ARRL is making much ado about
nothing in order to collect money from a dwindling membership.
Bob
kb8tl at yahoo dot com

"Bob P" wrote in message
y.com...
Intentional or not, the article makes ham radio sound pathetic and
antiquated. I'm starting to wonder if the ARRL is making much ado about
nothing in order to collect money from a dwindling membership.
Bob
kb8tl at yahoo dot com

Read the articles they link to on their site, arrl.org, about tests
performed in other countries. Most countries that have experimented with BPL
have abandoned it. I think BPL is just another scam. What does a power
company know about running broadband networks? They couldn't even keep their
own grid on line last year. They'll offer BPL at bargain prices to steal
marketshare from DSL and cable. Then the service will go to hell and the
prices will hit the heavens.

The difference between the U.S. and the other countries involved in testing
BPL is, there are a lot of 1.5-kW stations in this country. Maybe after a
few BPL modems melt down, the power companies will find other ways to gouge
their customers.

"PM"

"Bob P" wrote in message
y.com...
Intentional or not, the article makes ham radio sound pathetic and
antiquated. I'm starting to wonder if the ARRL is making much ado about
nothing in order to collect money from a dwindling membership.
Bob
kb8tl at yahoo dot com

Read the articles they link to on their site, arrl.org, about tests
performed in other countries. Most countries that have experimented with BPL
have abandoned it. I think BPL is just another scam. What does a power
company know about running broadband networks? They couldn't even keep their
own grid on line last year. They'll offer BPL at bargain prices to steal
marketshare from DSL and cable. Then the service will go to hell and the
prices will hit the heavens.

The difference between the U.S. and the other countries involved in testing
BPL is, there are a lot of 1.5-kW stations in this country. Maybe after a
few BPL modems melt down, the power companies will find other ways to gouge
their customers.

"PM"

"Bob P" wrote in message
y.com...
Intentional or not, the article makes ham radio sound pathetic and
antiquated. I'm starting to wonder if the ARRL is making much ado about
nothing in order to collect money from a dwindling membership.
Bob
kb8tl at yahoo dot com



Don't be persuaded by an ill-informed WSJ reporter ... the amateur ranks are
not "shrinking"
.... they've been growing steadily throughout recent history - though not as
much as *I'd* like.

Also, I can tell you from personal field tests and measurements that "access
BPL" is every bit
as bad as the ARRL indicates ... they are NOT "crying wolf" in ANY respect.

FEMA has also made a very strong statement against BPL and, while they
haven't released
their report yet, I expect that when they do the NTIA will also express
serious concerns/reservations
about access BPL as a threat to DoD, Homeland Security, and many of their
other Federal Govt.
"clients'" interest in, and reliance on, HF communications.

There is no "plot" at the ARRL "to raise money by stirring the pot vis a vis
BPL." If it were not for
the real and serious threat that BPL presents, they wouldn't NEED to raise
the money to defend
against it (or could raise money and use it for some useful purpose other
than defending our rights).

Many times articles in the press are way off base ... the WSJ one is one of
those cases, and I wrote
to the author telling him so and why ... I haven't received a response yet,
and may not, but maybe,
just maybe, next time he'll check his facts better before publishing such an
inbalanced and inaccurate
piece.

73,
Carl - wk3c

"Bob P" wrote in message
y.com...
Intentional or not, the article makes ham radio sound pathetic and
antiquated. I'm starting to wonder if the ARRL is making much ado about
nothing in order to collect money from a dwindling membership.
Bob
kb8tl at yahoo dot com



Don't be persuaded by an ill-informed WSJ reporter ... the amateur ranks are
not "shrinking"
.... they've been growing steadily throughout recent history - though not as
much as *I'd* like.

Also, I can tell you from personal field tests and measurements that "access
BPL" is every bit
as bad as the ARRL indicates ... they are NOT "crying wolf" in ANY respect.

FEMA has also made a very strong statement against BPL and, while they
haven't released
their report yet, I expect that when they do the NTIA will also express
serious concerns/reservations
about access BPL as a threat to DoD, Homeland Security, and many of their
other Federal Govt.
"clients'" interest in, and reliance on, HF communications.

There is no "plot" at the ARRL "to raise money by stirring the pot vis a vis
BPL." If it were not for
the real and serious threat that BPL presents, they wouldn't NEED to raise
the money to defend
against it (or could raise money and use it for some useful purpose other
than defending our rights).

Many times articles in the press are way off base ... the WSJ one is one of
those cases, and I wrote
to the author telling him so and why ... I haven't received a response yet,
and may not, but maybe,
just maybe, next time he'll check his facts better before publishing such an
inbalanced and inaccurate
piece.

73,
Carl - wk3c

John Walton wrote:

In This Power Play,
High-Wire Act Riles
Ham-Radio Fans

New Use for Lines Sparks
Tension With Operators;
'Firestorm' in Penn Yan
By KEN BROWN
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
March 23, 2004; Page A1


Matt Oja, an executive at
Progress Energy, whose test Mr. Powell visited. "This is a fairly vocal
group that has been whipped into a frenzy by their organization."

Heh. Does anyone else remember the mid-1990s frenzy of email initiated
by a considerably more naive ARRL against the perceived threat of "little
LEOs"?

Activism is the enemy of innovation in amateur radio.

Dana K6JQ

John Walton wrote:

In This Power Play,
High-Wire Act Riles
Ham-Radio Fans

New Use for Lines Sparks
Tension With Operators;
'Firestorm' in Penn Yan
By KEN BROWN
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
March 23, 2004; Page A1


Matt Oja, an executive at
Progress Energy, whose test Mr. Powell visited. "This is a fairly vocal
group that has been whipped into a frenzy by their organization."

Heh. Does anyone else remember the mid-1990s frenzy of email initiated
by a considerably more naive ARRL against the perceived threat of "little
LEOs"?

Activism is the enemy of innovation in amateur radio.

Dana K6JQ