Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
A company I used to work for manufactured a frequency hopper spread
spectrum unit. It was a 'slow' hopper, with Ack/noack for packets so it would retransmit a missed data packet which covered the case when a particular channel was occupied. The acquisition method would also work for a pretty fast frequency hopper too. It used a master unit that sent a sync signal burst every time it jumped to a new channel. The remote that was looking for the master would jump in a duplicate pattern, but at a slower jump rate until it heard the sync signal from the master. the remote would then start hopping at the correct rate, and follow the master as it hopped. Acquisition might be a bit slow, but it did work nicely, and it allowed other remotes to be turned on at any time and acquire the network. ============== I have never tinkered with an amateur radio version, but it seems to me that the ARRL has a book on spread spectrum and there are some FCC mandated requirements for the PN code, or the hopping pattern for freq hoppers, to allow the FCC to be able to listen in. The FCC also limited which frequency ranges Spread Spectrum can be used on, so I'd do a bit of digging before trying to build hardware...... Jim Pennell N6BIU |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
----- Original Message ----- From: "Laura Halliday" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 8:32 PM Subject: QUESTION: Homebrew Spread spectrum How to synchronize to direct-sequence spread spectrum should be obvious (think Costas Loop). A sliding-window correlator is a common approach, otherwise. Three correlators in parallel. One runs a little ahead, one is on time, the third runs a little behind. The LO free-runs (deliberately) a little slow or fast. When the locally-generated PN sequence lines up with the received sequence, the outputs from the early/late correlators track the LO, while the on-time correlator provides the output. Thanks for the info, Laura. I never did any work with a Direct sequence system, but this makes a lot of sense. Jim Pennell N6BIU |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
----- Original Message ----- From: "Laura Halliday" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 8:32 PM Subject: QUESTION: Homebrew Spread spectrum How to synchronize to direct-sequence spread spectrum should be obvious (think Costas Loop). A sliding-window correlator is a common approach, otherwise. Three correlators in parallel. One runs a little ahead, one is on time, the third runs a little behind. The LO free-runs (deliberately) a little slow or fast. When the locally-generated PN sequence lines up with the received sequence, the outputs from the early/late correlators track the LO, while the on-time correlator provides the output. Thanks for the info, Laura. I never did any work with a Direct sequence system, but this makes a lot of sense. Jim Pennell N6BIU |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tek 535A O Scope/1L-20 Spectrum Analyzer Question | Boatanchors | |||
Homebrew VHF/UHF mobile antenna question | Antenna | |||
QUESTION: Homebrew Spread spectrum | Homebrew | |||
Newbie qrp homebrew transmitter; another question | Homebrew | |||
Newbie qrp homebrew transmitter; another question | Homebrew |