Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
mike wrote:
I once read that it takes more energy to make, deliver, install a solar panel than the total energy you get out of it over it's 20 year lifetime. If that's true, (small scale PV) solar makes little sense from an environmental standpoint. My understanding is that improvements in the efficiency of the panels has no longer made that true... although of course to some degree it depends on where you end up installing the panels! An easy way to determine whether or not the statement could be true is to see whether or not the cost of the energy produced by the panel over its life -- using regular market rates -- exceeds its cost. If so, obviously the panel must be producing more energy than was requried to build it, since all the labor and materials the manufacturer put into the panel weren't free! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1420 - October 29, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1420 - October 29, 2004 | Dx | |||
Cell Phone Hardline | Antenna | |||
SOLAR constant voltage Xmfr question? | Equipment | |||
SOLAR constant voltage Xmfr question? | Equipment |