Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Watson A.Name - \"Watt Sun, the Dark Remover\" wrote:
"Anthony Matonak" wrote in message You could chose to eliminate chicken as well as beef, eggs and dairy. I'm no expert in either nutrition or food prices but I think you could [snip] The price penalty becomes even greater when you purchase food products that eliminate meat such as silk and soy bean and tofu meat substitutes. It's a matter of supply and demand; most people don't buy these things, so the prices are higher. The price penalty is only on items that try to replace or substitute for meat (and often failing miserably). If you simply purchase items such as beans, rice, grains, nuts and so forth, as they exist in nature (or at least, supermarket shelves) then their prices become very low. You can always find the most expensive or least energy efficient way of doing something but that doesn't mean that is the only, or even the most common, method in use. Anthony |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1420 - October 29, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1420 - October 29, 2004 | Dx | |||
Cell Phone Hardline | Antenna | |||
SOLAR constant voltage Xmfr question? | Equipment | |||
SOLAR constant voltage Xmfr question? | Equipment |