Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Burridge wrote in message . ..
.... It'd be fun to see just how fast you can force current in and out of an ordinary, GP power MOS FET gate to get it switching as fast as possible, I reckon, before pressing ahead with the dedicated devices. Back when hexfets first came out (1981 or so), I was having trouble with them self-destructing. Back then, at least, if you read far enough in the fine print, you'd find a maximum drain dv/dt rating. I was seeing close to 100V in about 5nsec just before the self-destruction as I recall. And the Siliconix V-mos transistors were good for RF power back in that era. If you're thinking driving it "digitally", that's probably the wrong answer. Resonate the input and output capacitances, and life will be much easier. Charging and discharging capacitance through a resistive source is quite inefficient. Remember, too, that tuned triode valve amplifiers are generally neutralized. Be VERY careful to not exceed the gate-source voltage rating! Have fun playing, but expect some "surprises." Cheers, Tom |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 6 May 2004 17:43:10 +0200, "Fred Bartoli"
r_AndThisToo wrote: "John Larkin" a écrit dans le message news: ... On 5 May 2004 16:41:11 -0700, (Tom Bruhns) wrote: Back when hexfets first came out (1981 or so), I was having trouble with them self-destructing. Back then, at least, if you read far enough in the fine print, you'd find a maximum drain dv/dt rating. And the substrate diode made a nice step-recovery diode, making it possible to generate lethal dv/dt's in totally non-obvious ways! If the drain load is resonated and you want some control over the resonant frequency (i.e. you have external to the mosfet tuning Cs) I don't see much discontinuities in inductors current. Of course when all the stuff is well "wired" and that's an entirely different matter, isn't it Paul ? ;-) John, can you suggest some refs that nicely snap ? I think that most mosfet substrate diodes are now designed to have soft recovery, so that they won't snap and make a horrible dv/dt. I blew up a lot of early Motorola mosfets in an h-bridge motor driver... had to switch to darlingtons, and only figured it out later. Anything with a p-i-n structure has a chance of being a snap diode. I think it needs a hyperbolic doping profile or something to work well. 1N4005-7 types work, but usually only after a brief forward bias, not DC. Somebody told me that many varicaps snap, but I haven't verified that. Specifically-designed PIN diodes (the kind used in RF switches and attenuators) don't snap, as they are doped to have very long recovery times. We tested over 60 different TO-220 power diodes to find the best high-voltage drift step-recovery part. Then we found something else, much better and more repeatable, but that's still a secret. John |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 6 May 2004 17:43:10 +0200, "Fred Bartoli"
r_AndThisToo wrote: "John Larkin" a écrit dans le message news: ... On 5 May 2004 16:41:11 -0700, (Tom Bruhns) wrote: Back when hexfets first came out (1981 or so), I was having trouble with them self-destructing. Back then, at least, if you read far enough in the fine print, you'd find a maximum drain dv/dt rating. And the substrate diode made a nice step-recovery diode, making it possible to generate lethal dv/dt's in totally non-obvious ways! If the drain load is resonated and you want some control over the resonant frequency (i.e. you have external to the mosfet tuning Cs) I don't see much discontinuities in inductors current. Of course when all the stuff is well "wired" and that's an entirely different matter, isn't it Paul ? ;-) John, can you suggest some refs that nicely snap ? I think that most mosfet substrate diodes are now designed to have soft recovery, so that they won't snap and make a horrible dv/dt. I blew up a lot of early Motorola mosfets in an h-bridge motor driver... had to switch to darlingtons, and only figured it out later. Anything with a p-i-n structure has a chance of being a snap diode. I think it needs a hyperbolic doping profile or something to work well. 1N4005-7 types work, but usually only after a brief forward bias, not DC. Somebody told me that many varicaps snap, but I haven't verified that. Specifically-designed PIN diodes (the kind used in RF switches and attenuators) don't snap, as they are doped to have very long recovery times. We tested over 60 different TO-220 power diodes to find the best high-voltage drift step-recovery part. Then we found something else, much better and more repeatable, but that's still a secret. John |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Larkin" a écrit dans le message news: ... On 5 May 2004 16:41:11 -0700, (Tom Bruhns) wrote: Back when hexfets first came out (1981 or so), I was having trouble with them self-destructing. Back then, at least, if you read far enough in the fine print, you'd find a maximum drain dv/dt rating. And the substrate diode made a nice step-recovery diode, making it possible to generate lethal dv/dt's in totally non-obvious ways! If the drain load is resonated and you want some control over the resonant frequency (i.e. you have external to the mosfet tuning Cs) I don't see much discontinuities in inductors current. Of course when all the stuff is well "wired" and that's an entirely different matter, isn't it Paul ? ;-) John, can you suggest some refs that nicely snap ? Thanks, Fred. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: JRL-2000F 1KW SOLID STATE HF LINEAR AMPLIFIER | Equipment | |||
RF amps: tuned load in Class A? | Homebrew | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |