Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/28/2016 4:22 PM, A. non Eyemouse wrote:
On 28/01/2016 15:39, Jerry Stuckle wrote: Actually, rram used to be a usable group, with some traffic even as recently as 2-3 years ago. But the current moderators have driven everyone away. I haven't heard anyone say anything good about the way the mods spam multiple newsgroups by posting copyrighted material without the owners' permissions. I'm all against the spamming, but it raises an interesting question - If you are referring to syndicating the content and the blog author has published at atom or rss feed then surely it is implied that they are giving permission to re-distribute it? Or did you mean some other copyrighted material? By international law, any published material, whether on the internet or otherwise, is copyrighted and cannot be copied without the explicit permission of the owner. This includes atom and rss feeds. These may be distributed to their subscribers, but the subscribers may not republish without the owners consent. It's like a newspaper. I get a copy of the Washington Post every day. I can read it. I can mention articles in passing. But I cannot republish the article without the Post's permission. Copyright law makes no distinction. It's the same in both cases. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |