Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
RFD away?
In message , Spike
writes On 29/01/2016 00:45, Mike Tomlinson wrote: En el artículo ple.org , Michael Black escribió: He could post to the rec.radio.amateur.moderated, and he isn't likely to get an answer. Except for the filler crossposted between there and other newsgroups, it's a pretty dead newsgroup, has been since the beginning. He (and you and anyone else) is welcome in uk.radio.amateur.moderated. It's fairly low-traffic at the moment, but the discussions so far have been of high quality. Quality, not quantity. Especially if you like computers, fixing the causes of broken web sites, or reading the occasional snow report. There's rather less mention of Amateur Radio topics. You continue to fail to understand that uk.r.a.m is not a 100% strictly-highy-technical-only-about-amateur-radio newsgroup. It's supposed to like the uk.r.a cesspool could be - if it wasn't for all the ****. However, as the number of posts declines after the initial enthusiasm has worn off, the group needs all the posts it can get. Three posters, one of which has limited technical knowledge, post one quarter of al traffic to date. Half of the 58 contributors to date post less than once a week. A disturbing proportion of those that voted for the group have neither posted at all, or posted a few times and have since disappeared I have to admit that I really can't work up the enthusiasm to be 'disturbed' by it. Moderation ensures that posts from the demented idiot who wrecks uk.radio.amateur complete with malicious crossposts to .antenna, ..equipment, .homebrew etc. to maximise the annoyance factor simply don't see the light of day. That also goes for those who have spent the last three years wrecking havoc on UKRA. But it should be noted that these people post far more on UKRA than UKRAM. I'm not of the psychopathology that drives these actions, but it's interesting to watch. If I could make an observation: I might be wrong, but I get the impression that since the creation of uk.r.a.m, in this cesspit there actually seems to have been an increase in the number of ****-free posts. Maybe some are learning from uk.r.a.m's example? Come along and say hello. Please do. Oh, do come along. You actually might enjoy it! -- Ian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
RFD away?
"Ian Jackson" wrote in message
... If I could make an observation: I might be wrong, but I get the impression that since the creation of uk.r.a.m, in this cesspit there actually seems to have been an increase in the number of ****-free posts. Maybe some are learning from uk.r.a.m's example? You are wrong, for all that has happened is that we who stand up for the traditions of amateur radio have continued in that vein whereas the troublemakers who voted for UKRAM, because they couldn't behave unless the kindergarten teacher was standing over them, have been ostracised. So the proportion of decent civilised posts may well have increased, but only because the troublemakers have been ostracised and, presumably, have stopped posting now that they no longer receive the oxygen of publicity. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
RFD away?
"gareth" wrote in message ... "Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... If I could make an observation: I might be wrong, but I get the impression that since the creation of uk.r.a.m, in this cesspit there actually seems to have been an increase in the number of ****-free posts. Maybe some are learning from uk.r.a.m's example? You are wrong, for all that has happened is that we who stand up for the traditions of amateur radio have continued in that vein whereas the troublemakers who voted for UKRAM, because they couldn't behave unless the kindergarten teacher was standing over them, have been ostracised. So the proportion of decent civilised posts may well have increased, but only because the troublemakers have been ostracised and, presumably, have stopped posting now that they no longer receive the oxygen of publicity. naw brian just taunted you...... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
RFD away?
"Jim GM4DHJ ..." wrote in message
... "gareth" wrote in message ... "Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... If I could make an observation: I might be wrong, but I get the impression that since the creation of uk.r.a.m, in this cesspit there actually seems to have been an increase in the number of ****-free posts. Maybe some are learning from uk.r.a.m's example? You are wrong, for all that has happened is that we who stand up for the traditions of amateur radio have continued in that vein whereas the troublemakers who voted for UKRAM, because they couldn't behave unless the kindergarten teacher was standing over them, have been ostracised. So the proportion of decent civilised posts may well have increased, but only because the troublemakers have been ostracised and, presumably, have stopped posting now that they no longer receive the oxygen of publicity. naw brian just taunted you...... I'll have to take your word for that, but without further comment. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
RFD away?
"gareth" wrote in message ... "Jim GM4DHJ ..." wrote in message ... "gareth" wrote in message ... "Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... If I could make an observation: I might be wrong, but I get the impression that since the creation of uk.r.a.m, in this cesspit there actually seems to have been an increase in the number of ****-free posts. Maybe some are learning from uk.r.a.m's example? You are wrong, for all that has happened is that we who stand up for the traditions of amateur radio have continued in that vein whereas the troublemakers who voted for UKRAM, because they couldn't behave unless the kindergarten teacher was standing over them, have been ostracised. So the proportion of decent civilised posts may well have increased, but only because the troublemakers have been ostracised and, presumably, have stopped posting now that they no longer receive the oxygen of publicity. naw brian just taunted you...... I'll have to take your word for that, but without further comment. it was the beginners house taunt ..... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
RFD away?
"Jim GM4DHJ ..." wrote in message
... "gareth" wrote in message ... I'll have to take your word for that, but without further comment. it was the beginners house taunt ..... Well, he kept insinuating that I had no technical competence, despite that I graduated in electronics when he was still in short trousers (or, even nappies, from the way that he cavorts in this NG?) A beginner, indeed! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
RFD away?
If I could make an observation:
I might be wrong, but I get the impression that since the creation of uk.r.a.m, in this cesspit there actually seems to have been an increase in the number of ****-free posts. Maybe some are learning from uk.r.a.m's example? no brian is still making them and trying to bate gareth but gareth is not rising to it......look at his katie hopkins post....he just can't leave it alone......proves he is one of the culprits .... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
RFD away?
Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Spike writes On 29/01/2016 00:45, Mike Tomlinson wrote: En el artÃ*culo ple.org , Michael Black escribió: He could post to the rec.radio.amateur.moderated, and he isn't likely to get an answer. Except for the filler crossposted between there and other newsgroups, it's a pretty dead newsgroup, has been since the beginning. He (and you and anyone else) is welcome in uk.radio.amateur.moderated. It's fairly low-traffic at the moment, but the discussions so far have been of high quality. Quality, not quantity. Especially if you like computers, fixing the causes of broken web sites, or reading the occasional snow report. There's rather less mention of Amateur Radio topics. You continue to fail to understand that uk.r.a.m is not a 100% strictly-highy-technical-only-about-amateur-radio newsgroup. It's supposed to like the uk.r.a cesspool could be - if it wasn't for all the ****. AFAICR, it was never postulated by the proponent or moderators during the RFD that ukram would be technical matters only. Quite the opposite. Spike doesn't often let reality intrude on his axe grinding, though, particularly not when he's got this much sand in his vagina. However, as the number of posts declines after the initial enthusiasm has worn off, the group needs all the posts it can get. Three posters, one of which has limited technical knowledge, post one quarter of al traffic to date. Half of the 58 contributors to date post less than once a week. A disturbing proportion of those that voted for the group have neither posted at all, or posted a few times and have since disappeared I have to admit that I really can't work up the enthusiasm to be 'disturbed' by it. Moderation ensures that posts from the demented idiot who wrecks uk.radio.amateur complete with malicious crossposts to .antenna, ..equipment, .homebrew etc. to maximise the annoyance factor simply don't see the light of day. That also goes for those who have spent the last three years wrecking havoc on UKRA. But it should be noted that these people post far more on UKRA than UKRAM. I'm not of the psychopathology that drives these actions, but it's interesting to watch. If I could make an observation: I might be wrong, but I get the impression that since the creation of uk.r.a.m, in this cesspit there actually seems to have been an increase in the number of ****-free posts. Maybe some are learning from uk.r.a.m's example? Project Shun has done wonders for the group, again. Come along and say hello. Please do. Oh, do come along. You actually might enjoy it! He's enjoying moaning about it much more than he ever would using it! -- STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|