Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Burridge wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:41:43 -0700, Bill Turner wrote: Peak-to-peak voltage has no meaning when computing power. There is no such thing as peak-to-peak power. Why not? p-p power is essentially "peak envelope power" isn't it? Are you saying there's one rule for RF and another for audio?? A: There is such a thing as peak-to-peak power, it's just not generally very useful -- an example would be a 10Vrms sinewave drive to a 10 ohm capacitor. The instantaneous power going into the capacitor would peak at 5W and the instantaneous power going out of the capacitor would peak at 5W. If you defined delivered power as positive and returned power as negative then the peak-to-peak power would be 10W -- but you would almost never care. B: P-P audio power is _not_ the same thing as "peak envelope power", at least not as defined in the US. Peak envelope power is average power of the RF at the peak of the envelope -- so if you are running sine-wave modulated AM with a PEP of 1500 watts into 50 ohms the peak _envelope_ power happens at an _rms_ RF voltage of 274V -- but the _peak_ power happens at the RF voltage peak of 387V, or 3kW. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reducing IC28H power output | Equipment | |||
Reducing IC28H power output | Equipment | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Help with TS-930S Power Output | Boatanchors |