Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Turner wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 01:28:13 -0700, Roy Lewallen wrote: You can use the basic definition of RMS to calculate an RMS value of power from the instantaneous power, but it's not useful for anything. A resistor dissipating 10 watts of average power gets exactly as hot if that average power is supplied by DC, a sine wave, or any other waveform. That's not true of the RMS power -- different waveforms producing the same average power and causing the same amount of heat will produce different RMS powers. So average power is a very useful value, while RMS power is not. __________________________________________________ _______ That goes against everything I've ever read about RMS power, at least for sine waves. I have always heard that a certain value of RMS power produces the same heating as the same value of DC power. I'd be interested in where you've read this. It's wrong. I suspect that if you go back and read carefully, you'll find that it's the RMS value of the voltage or current that causes the same heating as the same DC value, not the RMS value of the power. Incidentally, I should mention that "RMS power" is used by the makers of audio amplifiers. About four years ago, this topic came up on rec.radio.amateur.antenna, and Jim Kelley commented about it: Jim Kelley wrote: I found out the answer to this usage of RMS power. The audio folks have co-opted the RMS idea to mean the following: If the signal is a single sine wave, then RMS power is understood to mean the average power output due to that sine wave. It is deceptive to the following extent: An amplifier with a certain "RMS power rating" may go completely flat on peaks that are only a little greater than the RMS rating. Anyway, the use of the term is pervasive. So the term is sometimes used in the consumer audio world, although incorrectly. One shouldn't look to the audio consumer world for accurate technical information about anything. In your statement above, you say that's true only for average power, not RMS, and is true for *any* waveform, including sine waves. Let me demonstrate my statement about the average power being the square of the RMS voltage divided by R for any waveform. Call the voltage time waveform v(t). This was V * sin(wt) for my sine wave example, but let it be any periodic waveform. The RMS value of the voltage Vrms is, by definition, sqrt(avg(v(t)^2)). Applied to a resistor, the power time waveform p(t) is v(t)^2/R, so the average power is avg(p(t)) = avg(v(t)^2/R) = avg(v(t)^2)/R. (The 1/R term can be moved out of the average since it doesn't vary with time -- the time average of 1/R = 1/R.) From the definition of RMS voltage, you can see that avg(v(t)^2)/R is simply Vrms^2/R. This was demonstrated without any assumption about the nature of v(t) except that it's periodic. The RMS power caused by that v(t) waveform would be sqrt(avg(p(t)^2)) = sqrt(avg(v(t)^4/R^2)) = sqrt(avg(v(t)^4))/R. This is different from the average, with the size of the difference depending on the shape of the waveform. Is there a new world order? No, but hopefully there's some new knowledge being gained. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reducing IC28H power output | Equipment | |||
Reducing IC28H power output | Equipment | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Help with TS-930S Power Output | Boatanchors |