Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Keinanen" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:58:17 -0600, "Steve Nosko" wrote: Why both? It is the total series cap which is of concern. ... Yes, it is doable with one fixed capacitor, however, the voltages across the stray capacitances would be different and their effect would be harder to predict. Yes, at the higher freqs, strays become significant, as I remarked. .... For a given total capacitance, putting more varactors in parallel means that the capacitance each varactor must produce is reduced, thus the tuning voltage must be increased, which is a good thing, since this improves the ratio between the tuning voltage and RF voltage. Dropping the impedance levels and hence increasing the capacitance required also means that even more varactors can be connected in parallel. .... Let me ponder this... By golly, running several parallel varactors at fifty volts does sound good, doesn't it. You are away from the high non-linear region near zero. Never had that option, I guess. -- Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: MORE MULTIPLE LOTS of Various Electronic Components | Homebrew | |||
FA: MORE MULTIPLE LOTS of Various Electronic Components | Homebrew | |||
FA: MULTIPLE LOTS of Various Electronic Components | Homebrew | |||
FA: MULTIPLE LOTS of Various Electronic Components | Homebrew | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna |