Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The power company run a line to my house. They supply me with
electricity. This amounts to a 230V, 65A facility at the distribution board in a cupboard under the stairs. I run all my stuff from that board. The board contains several RCBOs that trip-out in the event of any leakage current being sensed. If current in = current out; they're happy and won't trip. Because they don't trip out, I conclude I don't use any current. The voltage supplied is 230VAC RMS. Since this is alternating between equal positive and negative half-cycles, the average level of this voltage supply is zero. I use no current and they effectively supply no voltage. Why do I get billed for electricity usage when I clearly can't have used any? -- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:42:19 +0000, the renowned Paul Burridge
wrote: The power company run a line to my house. They supply me with electricity. This amounts to a 230V, 65A facility at the distribution board in a cupboard under the stairs. I run all my stuff from that board. The board contains several RCBOs that trip-out in the event of any leakage current being sensed. If current in = current out; they're happy and won't trip. Because they don't trip out, I conclude I don't use any current. No, you don't use hardly any leakage current to earth (RCD), and you don't use more than the maximum trip current between lines (MCB). An RCBO is an MCB + RCD, to use the Brit terms. The voltage supplied is 230VAC RMS. Since this is alternating between equal positive and negative half-cycles, the average level of this voltage supply is zero. But the RMS value is 230VAC. I use no current and they effectively supply no voltage. Why do I get billed for electricity usage when I clearly can't have used any? Why don't you ring up the power company engineers and see if you can get them to see things your way? Could save a lot of money. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany -- "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:42:19 +0000, Paul Burridge
wrote: The power company run a line to my house. They supply me with electricity. This amounts to a 230V, 65A facility at the distribution board in a cupboard under the stairs. I run all my stuff from that board. The board contains several RCBOs that trip-out in the event of any leakage current being sensed. If current in = current out; they're happy and won't trip. Because they don't trip out, I conclude I don't use any current. The voltage supplied is 230VAC RMS. Since this is alternating between equal positive and negative half-cycles, the average level of this voltage supply is zero. I use no current and they effectively supply no voltage. Why do I get billed for electricity usage when I clearly can't have used any? You don't get billed for current, you get billed for energy - in the UK the measure is the kilowatt hour. Multiply your voltage by your current instant by instant, take the average (gives you power) and multiply that by the duration in hours and you have your consumption. NIce try, though... d Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:09:35 +0000, Paul Burridge
wrote: Sorry, Don, you obviously haven't thought this through. Since *all* their current is returned, I cannot have used *any* of it. Whatever the voltage might be, multiplying it by zero Amps still gives zero power! --- That's not how they do it. Since they know that they'll get back every bit of current they send you, they keep track of what they send you for three months, normalize it to 1 and call it "a", call what you send them back "b", and then do the followwing maths: normalize a: a = 1 set b = a: a = b multiply both sides by a: a² = ab subtract b² from both sides: a² - b² = ab - b² factor both sides: (a + b)(a - b) = b (a - b) divide both sides by (a - b): (a + b)(a - b) = b (a - b) -------------- ----------- (a - b) (a - b) remove terms which cancel ((a -b)) from both sides: a + b = b convert: 1 + 1 = 1 So, you can see that the sum of the amount they sent you and the amount they received back _has_ to be the same as the amount they sent you, and that's what they bill you for. -- John Fields |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:09:35 +0000, Paul Burridge
wrote: On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:48:00 GMT, (Don Pearce) wrote: Aww c'mon - if you multiply a positive voltage by a positive current you get positive power. If you multiply negative voltage by negative current you get positive power. Sorry, Don, you obviously haven't thought this through. Since *all* their current is returned, I cannot have used *any* of it. Whatever the voltage might be, multiplying it by zero Amps still gives zero power! Paul, perhaps you should be a politician... What you are charged for is the use of the current as it flows through your appliances etc. Because the current flows in your appliances it places a load on their generating plant. Because millions of houses are also doing the same thing at the same time the load on the generating plant is enormous and in order to supply the large amount of current required by all users (yes, even though they do get it back in the return feed), the generating plant has to be enormous itself. Now, power stations aren't something you pick off a tree, they have to be built and maintained and they consume "energy" in order to be able to generate the large amount of current which flows. Now even a dill can see that the cost of building and running the plant has to be paid for and the cost of doing this is usually amortised over a period of 15 or 20 years and after that it is pure profit. So you are paying for the current which flows through your systems to generate heat, cool and cook your food, run your stereo etc, etc. Now despite your fallacious arguments about supply voltage summing to zero and the supply authority getting all their current back after having gone through your house, you can't argue that you shouldn't be charged purely for no other reason than the law stating the conservation of energy. "Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, but may only be changed from one form to another." The supply authority is changing one form of energy to another in order to generate electrical energy and you are changing the energy they supply into other forms required to generate heat, cooling etc in your household. I can tell you this, converting energy from one form to another doesn't come free and not even a politician would be stupid enough to believe that it does. Anyway - are you cleaning and refurbishing those amps before you give them back? Why should I? That's *their* job. I pay enough! They wear out, you know. You mean they like lose their charge after a while? That would make sense as I've found as years have gone by, I've had to turn the heating up more and more. The thieving *******s! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, you can look at it this way...It's basically a series circuit,
from generator, through all customer houses, and back to the generator. You may be returning ALMOST all of the current coming into your house, minus resistive losses, but if you divert that voltage and current through one of your appliances, the voltage and current (hence power) will actually be doing some work. Electricity, while being USED in your house, is like an employee of YOURS...it is doing WORK, so legally you must pay the worker's wages for work performed. Just be glad you don't have to pay it's social security taxes, fed and state taxes, health insurance, worker's comp insurance premiums, 401K contributions, etc. Starts to make electricity (employee) sound cheap. Scott Paul Burridge wrote: Sorry, Don, you obviously haven't thought this through. Since *all* their current is returned, I cannot have used *any* of it. Whatever the voltage might be, multiplying it by zero Amps still gives zero power! |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Huh? It's only 5:30AM here and I just got up but, the ONLY time you
aren't consuming power is at the zero crossing of the voltage and current sine waves (assuming a purely resistive load where I and E are in phase). Since you are paying for power, which is P=I X E, during the negative half cycle, you have, for example, -168 Volts X -1 Amp = +168 Watts...try it on a calculator...negative times a negative is positive. Scott Paul Burridge wrote: On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:56:34 GMT, (Don Pearce) wrote: You don't get billed for current, you get billed for energy - in the UK the measure is the kilowatt hour. Hey, whose side are you on? ;-) Multiply your voltage by your current instant by instant, take the average (gives you power) and multiply that by the duration in hours and you have your consumption. They don't bill me instant-by-instant; they bill me for the power they claim I've used over the course of a three-monthly period. Since power is the product of voltage and current (and I've proved earlier that both are zero) I'm being charged for electricity that I've not actually used. The current goes in and out of the house unchanged. It's all returned to the power company. All I've done is borrow it. And you can bet that when they get their current back they don't just dump it to ground; oh no. They re-sell it again and again and again to other suckers like me. We're all paying multiple sums for the *same* lousy current that's probably been circulating for years. The power companies have been scamming us for decades! I can't believe I've only just woken up to it. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|