Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Terry wrote:
Was anybody keeping count of the number of postings to this thread BEFORE it became personal and acrimonious? Seems like some posters lack the necessary sense of humour? They seem to hate anythingthey say be challenged? Then, as a reaction they descend in childish name calling and attempts at derision. Shame! Sticking to the subject. "Why electricity (for our antique radios of course) is/is not free". Well, hmm! The tube heaters use full wave, but what about those pulses of one way rectified half wave AC for the B+? (Primarily in non transformer radios!). Intended pun; non power transformer radios don't have a primary! :-) Personally I'd like to 'rectify'? my high electricity cost! Our consumption is recorded by a 60 cycle analog AC meter on the outside of my house, which is owned by the power company and read and billed monthly. Maybe I could get those positive half cycles and then not 'return' the negative ones, as someone has already suggested, and reduce electricity consumption that way? Joking of course :-) What good would half cycles be to respectable AC operated equipment? So anybody got any other 'practical' ideas, in addition to burning my non electric wood stove during the winter, to reducing my electrical heating cost? Our domestic electricity presently costs about 9 cents Canadian per kilowatt hour. That's roughly 7 cents US and roughly 4 UK New Pence, per unit/kilowatt hour. Which means running ones 1MW anti-gravity machine only costs a trivial $70 per hour. Cheap at twice the price. Kevin Aylward http://www.anasoft.co.uk SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture, Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim L." wrote in message om... Hi- If you are not using any "electricity" then turn off your main circuit breaker. You should not notice any difference. Jim Still wondering if there is a way to 'rectify' this thread misunderstanding? |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
"Terry" wrote in message
... "Jim L." wrote in message om... Hi- If you are not using any "electricity" then turn off your main circuit breaker. You should not notice any difference. Jim Still wondering if there is a way to 'rectify' this thread misunderstanding? I've got bucket loads of half-waves I rectified and don't need if anyone wants to make an offer..... |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:48:19 +1300, "Ken Taylor"
wrote: "Terry" wrote in message .. . "Jim L." wrote in message om... Hi- If you are not using any "electricity" then turn off your main circuit breaker. You should not notice any difference. Jim Still wondering if there is a way to 'rectify' this thread misunderstanding? I've got bucket loads of half-waves I rectified and don't need if anyone wants to make an offer..... --- Positive or negative-going? -- John Fields |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
"John Fields" wrote in message
... On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:48:19 +1300, "Ken Taylor" wrote: "Terry" wrote in message .. . "Jim L." wrote in message om... Hi- If you are not using any "electricity" then turn off your main circuit breaker. You should not notice any difference. Jim Still wondering if there is a way to 'rectify' this thread misunderstanding? I've got bucket loads of half-waves I rectified and don't need if anyone wants to make an offer..... --- Positive or negative-going? -- John Fields Sorry, I don't sort them - they're a job lot. Ken |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:42:19 +0000 Paul Burridge
wrote: The power company run a line to my house. They supply me with electricity. This amounts to a 230V, 65A facility at the distribution board in a cupboard under the stairs. I run all my stuff from that board. The board contains several RCBOs that trip-out in the event of any leakage current being sensed. If current in = current out; they're happy and won't trip. Because they don't trip out, I conclude I don't use any current. The voltage supplied is 230VAC RMS. Since this is alternating between equal positive and negative half-cycles, the average level of this voltage supply is zero. I use no current and they effectively supply no voltage. Why do I get billed for electricity usage when I clearly can't have used any? I've been watching this thread for a couple of days, and I gotta believe it's just a troll. But while we're at it, why not ask the same question about your water bill. After all, they're just charging you for water, most of which just gets returned, with "interest." ;-) - ----------------------------------------------- Jim Adney Madison, WI 53711 USA ----------------------------------------------- |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:15:39 +0000, Kevin Aylward wrote:
Terry wrote: Was anybody keeping count of the number of postings to this thread BEFORE it became personal and acrimonious? Seems like some posters lack the necessary sense of humour? They seem to hate anythingthey say be challenged? Then, as a reaction they descend in childish name calling and attempts at derision. Shame! Sticking to the subject. "Why electricity (for our antique radios of course) is/is not free". Well, hmm! The tube heaters use full wave, but what about those pulses of one way rectified half wave AC for the B+? (Primarily in non transformer radios!). Intended pun; non power transformer radios don't have a primary! :-) Personally I'd like to 'rectify'? my high electricity cost! Our consumption is recorded by a 60 cycle analog AC meter on the outside of my house, which is owned by the power company and read and billed monthly. Maybe I could get those positive half cycles and then not 'return' the negative ones, as someone has already suggested, and reduce electricity consumption that way? Joking of course :-) What good would half cycles be to respectable AC operated equipment? So anybody got any other 'practical' ideas, in addition to burning my non electric wood stove during the winter, to reducing my electrical heating cost? Our domestic electricity presently costs about 9 cents Canadian per kilowatt hour. That's roughly 7 cents US and roughly 4 UK New Pence, per unit/kilowatt hour. Which means running ones 1MW anti-gravity machine only costs a trivial $70 per hour. Cheap at twice the price. I don't know where you buy your antigravity machines, but that's way out of line. Whadday lifting, the Great Pyramids? ;-) Rich |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:19:45 -0600, Jim Adney wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:42:19 +0000 Paul Burridge wrote: The power company run a line to my house. They supply me with electricity. This amounts to a 230V, 65A facility at the distribution board in a cupboard under the stairs. I run all my stuff from that board. The board contains several RCBOs that trip-out in the event of any leakage current being sensed. If current in = current out; they're happy and won't trip. Because they don't trip out, I conclude I don't use any current. The voltage supplied is 230VAC RMS. Since this is alternating between equal positive and negative half-cycles, the average level of this voltage supply is zero. I use no current and they effectively supply no voltage. Why do I get billed for electricity usage when I clearly can't have used any? I've been watching this thread for a couple of days, and I gotta believe it's just a troll. But while we're at it, why not ask the same question about your water bill. After all, they're just charging you for water, most of which just gets returned, with "interest." ;-) This isn't as funny as it sounds. I was renting a room from a guy once, and he was complaining that when he waters his lawn, they add the gallonage (or whatever the word is) to his sewer bill, the theory being that most of the water to a house goes out the city sewer. I suggested rain barrels, but he didn't think that was very funny, either. Cheers! Rich |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 19:59:29 GMT, Rich Grise wrote:
This isn't as funny as it sounds. I was renting a room from a guy once, and he was complaining that when he waters his lawn, they add the gallonage (or whatever the word is) to his sewer bill, the theory being that most of the water to a house goes out the city sewer. My wastewater charge is directly tied to my incoming water consumption metering. I get a slight advantage, however, in that I go to the pub every night, drink 10 pints of beer and don't need the lavatory until I get home. :P -- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:27:09 +0000, Paul Burridge wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 19:59:29 GMT, Rich Grise wrote: This isn't as funny as it sounds. I was renting a room from a guy once, and he was complaining that when he waters his lawn, they add the gallonage (or whatever the word is) to his sewer bill, the theory being that most of the water to a house goes out the city sewer. My wastewater charge is directly tied to my incoming water consumption metering. I get a slight advantage, however, in that I go to the pub every night, drink 10 pints of beer and don't need the lavatory until I get home. :P I've heard that that can also keep little critters out of your vegetables. :-) Cheers! Rich |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|