| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Len wrote:
In order to measure any inductance component, the only requirement is to find the DIFFERENTIAL between a direct short across the bridge/RLC-meter connections and the device itself (in this case a resistor). Neil Hecht's excellent little LC Meter II does this automatically by the zeroing button that subtracts the shorting inductance from the device measurement, done arithmetically in the internal microcontroller's registers. I completely agree that all impedance measuring devices should be "zeroed" in this way. But the problem with the resistor wires that we're discussing here is *additional* to that. We want to know the inductance of the metal-film resistor body, with the wires cut very short as they would be for any application where low inductance is important. However, for convenience, my first measurements used almost the full length of the resistor wires to connect to the N socket of the VNA. It turned out that the total measured inductance is comparable to what you'd find from the wires alone, so the body inductance is very small (which is entirely consistent with the physical construction). The suggestion had been to determine the inductance of the resistor body by first repeating that original measurement, then applying conductive paint to short out the resistor body, and then measuring again. The body inductance would then be the difference between those two measurements. Unfortunately that would be a poorly designed experiment, because the resistor wires were bent around into a floppy loop whose size and shape - and therefore inductance - is not very well controlled. The very small inductance of the resistor body could easily become lost in variations caused by small accidental movements of the wires. It is also an experiment that cannot be repeated, because of the conductive paint. If I'd found time at the weekend, I would have made up a little plate like W4ZCB described. The N2PK VNA uses a three-step calibration with open, short and 50R standard loads. For this jig, I'd have had to start with the open-circuit connector spill, followed by a solder-blob short, and finally by the best solderable 50R load I could make (probably two 100R chip resistors in parallel). Then I'd have cut short the wires of the test resistor, and soldered that in place on the plate for the actual measurement. But unfortunately the whole weekend timed ou -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| WTB: carbon comp resistors 1/2watt | Boatanchors | |||
| non-inductive resistors: metal-film vs carbon ? | Antenna | |||
| FS - H/D METAL HOUSED RESISTORS 250w/100w | Boatanchors | |||
| FS - H/D METAL HOUSED RESISTORS 250w/100w | Boatanchors | |||