Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi, fellow radio enthusiasts,
Take a look at this: http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...306285 9&rd=1 Stare adoringly at it, then tell me what is meant by a "Pulse Forming Network" - I'd be interested to know what this design feature is. Thanks, p. -- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Behold, Paul Burridge signalled from keyed 4-1000A filament:
Hi, fellow radio enthusiasts, Take a look at this: http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...306285 9&rd=1 Stare adoringly at it, then tell me what is meant by a "Pulse Forming Network" - I'd be interested to know what this design feature is. Thanks, p. Radar? -- Gregg t3h g33k "Ratings are for transistors....tubes have guidelines" http://geek.scorpiorising.ca |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A "pulse forming network" is a simple LC lumped approximation to a short
circuited transmission line. A voltage step is applied to it, and after the round trip time of the "transmission line", the input drops back to zero. The resulting pulse is applied as the supply voltage to a radar transmitting tube such as a klystron or magnetron, which produces an RF output pulse of that width. Because a PFN limits you to a fixed pulse width, I doubt they're used much any more -- there are lots of advantages in being able to vary the pulse width. I worked on heavy ground radar on the DEW line in the mid '60s, where this technology was used. On the radar I worked on the most(*), a pulse of several kV was applied to a PFN by connecting it to a power supply with a thyratron. The thyratron was extinguished when the trailing edge of the pulse occurred. The pulse width was a few microseconds. This was applied to the primary of an oil-filled transformer which the magnatron plugged directly into. The transformer stepped the pulse voltage up by ten times and applied it to the cathode of the magnatron, which then oscillated for the duration. The applied power during the time of the pulse was over 5 MW, giving 5 MW output power. The pulse repitition rate was between 2 and 3 ms, so the average power was in the several kW range, and the range of the radar was several hundred miles. The insides of the PFN would physically constrict when forming a pulse, so it produced a fairly loud audible buzz of 400 Hz or so when the radar was operating. (*) See http://www.radarpages.co.uk/mob/rotor/fps6.htm or http://www.radomes.org/museum/equip/fps-6.html. I don't think the ebay PFN came from this exact same model of radar, but it's from one of comparable size and vintage. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Paul Burridge wrote: Hi, fellow radio enthusiasts, Take a look at this: http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...306285 9&rd=1 Stare adoringly at it, then tell me what is meant by a "Pulse Forming Network" - I'd be interested to know what this design feature is. Thanks, p. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
(*) See http://www.radarpages.co.uk/mob/rotor/fps6.htm or http://www.radomes.org/museum/equip/fps-6.html. I don't think the ebay PFN came from this exact same model of radar, but it's from one of comparable size and vintage. Anyone who did a radar course at RAF Locking in the late 50's or early 60's should remember the FPS-6 height finder alongside one of the training blocks as the "Nodding Horror" since such was its local name. The PFN in that eBay ad is of British manufacture. You can tell that from the '99' in the NATO part number and the colour scheme is typical also. Cheers - Joe |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wanted Hammerlund Hq 110 I.f transformer | Boatanchors | |||
Chicago Transformer Mod Transformer CMS-1 Specs wanted | Boatanchors | |||
isolation transformer | Equipment | |||
NC 155 Receiver Transformer Data?? | Equipment | |||
NC 155 Receiver Transformer Data?? | Equipment |