Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Howie wrote on 7/26/2017 8:09 AM:
In message , Gareth's Downstairs Computer writes Intrigued by the possibility of Binaural reception, where audio filtering passes lo frequencies to the left ear and higher ones to the right, causing the tuning of a CW signal to move in front of your eyes, and musing that headphones today are invariably stereo, and that LM386 audio amps are as cheap as chips, that it should be a feature of receivers to have two audio amps for the stereo effect with the splitting filters before either of them, and that those wishing speaker output might just as well use the audio amps sold for computer use, and now that the 100 miniature roller-operated microswitches have arrived from China it is time to get on with the "vapourware" 50 years RX project, if anything, just to spite / spike one of M3OSN's guns? (C) Copyright 2017 The Impossibly Long Sentence Co Ltd :-) We discussed this last year. I had some limited success using Spectrumlab software but hit problems with tuning latency. SM0VPO has a circuit for a hardware version here. Http://www.sm0vpo.com/ under Morse Code, Stereo CW That's what happens when you try to use a PC to do an MCU's job! Dedicated hardware is pretty mundane. This should be a pretty simple task on fairly minimal hardware. Filtering software is not too complex. A single FIR filter can be used to generate one channel, say the low pass, then the high pass can be found by subtracting that from the original signal. This could be extended to work with a surround sound speaker arrangement and achieve 360 degree separation of signals. Audio processing on MCUs is not at all over taxing these days. A Raspberry Pi would be a great platform to at least test out the concept and allow 100% COTS hardware. -- Rick C |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Not a bad idea, actually... | CB | |||
Any Idea What This Is? | Scanner | |||
[Fwd: Any Idea What This Is?] | Scanner | |||
PC controlled reciever --- good idea? bad idea? or a just plain ugly one? | Scanner | |||
Any idea on what is better? | CB |