Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23/12/17 13:08, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:39:08 -0600, Charles Richmond wrote: [snip] Back in the bad old days, two houses on different sides of the same freeway... a phone call from one house to the other... was a long-distant toll call !!! That is sort of analogous to speaking dialects !!! :-) I always thought that that nonsense could have been solved by using a better zone system. A call to the same zone or only one zone away would be local; the others would be long distance. Set the zones to allow for cities and geography. Would this have been workable? Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko I don't often use 'snail mail' in Europe (we are still in Europe) but, as I recall, for some time it has been possible to send a letter within the EU for the same cost as a local one. As I recall, when this was introduced, the rationale was that the bulk of the infra structure was in place in each country and if, for example, I paid more to post to Germany (I'm in the UK) the UK didn't 'hand over' any of the extra I paid to any Post Office 'on route'- in the end it all just 'balanced out'. Logically, the same must apply for telephone calls. Obviously a 'long distance call' uses resources but, in the round, things balance out. There will be exceptions- areas which have low numbers of travellers etc. but, for most cases, surely the logic applies. A mobile call in the UK costs the same if the two 'ends' are 50m apart or 300miles. Why not the same for landline calls? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pepper And Salt (Seasoned Greetings) to all our readers - the Xmas FAQ | Homebrew | |||
Pepper And Salt (Seasoned Greetings) to all our readers - the Xmas FAQ | Policy | |||
Another day at the salt mine | General | |||
Another day at the salt mine | Policy | |||
KSL Salt Lake on 26.190 FM now | Shortwave |