Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Airy R.Bean" wrote in message ... The best software for any self-respecting _REAL_ Radio Ham is that which he writes for himself. It is CBer who buy such things off-the-shelf. It is very much the case with software that you can manufacture a much better product than any you can buy for a very small percentage of the cost. Oh, so we can be sure that you wrote the operating system and mail program that you are using to access the newsgroup? Or do you have no self respect? Perhaps you have enough time to generate the software for the rest of us that don't have the time to spend even more time coding than we have to already. Unless you are a professional coder, then don't disrespect the profession by suggesting that anyone can hack up a program for lower cost with better performance. If you are a professional coder then considering your posts, perhaps anyone could output code that is better than what you are being paid for, so anyone could produce code with better performance than what you can output. If you are a professional at anything, then stay with your field of expertise. Can you cite any accomplishments that you have achieved? thanks, John. KC5DWD |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interested in high-performance tube-based AM tuner designs | Shortwave | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner | |||
FA ICOM AH-4 Automatic Antenna Tuner | Swap |