Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 8 May 2005 06:25:45 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote: Russ: That is my point! Too many look at ham radio as "special" and "separate." What I suggested was gov't, commercial and, yes, even CB in that suggestion. I am just guessing, but you market to that wide a group and you are just bound to sell a dozen--or two! grin And, having the design so others can purchase rights (reasonably charged!) to use "your case", then the innovation brought to the market by "the many manufacturers" (and thousands of minds) gives your product real "SEX APPEAL!" Intriguing idea, but how would this work with varying licensing requirements on some of your proposed bands, maximum power differences, as well as the "type acceptance" or certification required for operation? Would changing cards within such a unit count as a mod, presently only allowed for licensed amateurs transmitting on amateur frequencies? You are on the right track as far as getting marketable numbers, but the rules are so different for the various bands you mention, I am not sure that can be resolved, even if all of the technical issues can be. Happy trails, Gary (net.yogi.bear) -- At the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Any GE Progress Line Units Still Around? | Boatanchors | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | General | |||
Why do hams always stand in the way of progress? | Scanner |