Bill:

Sounds like we have equal values, or close enough. I joke a lot, but do
have a serious side...

I have been out of line and called upon it--and if my actions are of
questionable nature--that can be put forward... I do all of this as a
hobby... a guy wants to have a bit of fun... I make mistakes--too
frequently...

But, I realize I have opinions not shared by all, and the opposite is
true... if you can't say what you think/see/feel then what good is life in
America...

Thanks for your input, never hurts for a guy to examine what he is about...
I will keep your comments in mind... they are well taken here...

Warmest regards,
John
--
When Viagra fails to work--you are DOOMED!!!

"-exray-" wrote in message
...
| John Smith wrote:
|
| Ohhh, well, you are correct.
|
| Of course I am. I simply expressed an opinion of mine
|
| While not attempting to invoke "havoc", "discord" and "chaos", I view
the
| manner in which topics are handled as being the deciding factor--foul
| language, character assassinations and promoting outwardly dangerous
evils
| which threaten the moral fabric of society are as disgusting to me as
the
| next guy...
|
| And you are also correct on this aspect.
|
|
| If the material is just gauged on whether it provokes debate, argument
and
| thought--and if the measure of this is simply how many posts are invoked
as
| responses--with the desirable number set as one or NONE--then further
delays
| in progress should be expected...
|
| I don't think anybody filters because of this. If the presenter of such
| debate has a reputation as in your first example...all bets are off.
| That is for me to imply that mud-slinging, name-calling, goading or any
| wild-eyed radical or raffish behaviour, in spite of the best intentions
| of the poster, will cause his occasional good points to be overwhelmed
| by the cacophony of kill-filters at work.
|
| -Bill