Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K7ITM wrote: Huh? You wrote, "if tight winding results in a lower Q/other effects, why space the windings for air-core, crystal radio coils, period?" Do you not want a higher Q? Generally, people try for the highest unloaded Q they can get, under some set of constraints. Sorry, I made a typo. Rather, why do people tight-wrap coils, period? Just ease of construction? Close spacing lowers the Q mainly because the current in the wire is no longer radially symmetrical, if you look at a cross-section of the (round) wire. That raises the RF resistance of the wire. For decent (low-loss) form material, it's mainly the RF resistance of the wire that determines the loss and therefore the Q. Generally, highest Q for a given diameter and length is obtained by spacing the wire about two wire diameters, center to center, at least for high frequency work. If you want to use Litz wire, there's an optimum stranding...more, finer strands are not necessarily better as you get to either lower or higher frequencies. You should be able to find info on that, if you do some searching. SNIP Cheers, Tom Thanks for the information! Is there an advantage to wrapping cylinder coils as opposed to spider or torroid, other than ease of construction? I'm debating which one I'd likely get the best result with... I'll probably make both to try it out, but I'd like to know which one would 'probably' work best. Thanks again, Dave |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Receivers, software, etc. | Shortwave | |||
Simple tests | Shortwave | |||
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
BEWARE SPENDING TIME ANSWERING QUESTIONS HERE (WAS Electronic Questions) | Antenna |