Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Wes Stewart on Fri 12 Aug 2005 10:09
On 12 Aug 2005 06:30:47 -0700, "Tim Shoppa" wrote: I'm fixing up some older ham transmitters. 811 or 6146 finals, etc. in the 50-200 watt class. The idea behind the multiple section windings on these chokes is the prevention of unwanted resonances. Absolutely. A self-parallel-resonant inductor above its resonant frequency will appear as a CAPACITOR. Here is an example of a solenoid wound choke that uses different winding lengths and diameters to place resonances outside the range of operation: http://www.qsl.net/n7ws/RF_Choke.jpg Excellent photo quality there, Wes. Also, it amused me to see so MANY sections on that RFC assembly! :-) I've seen quite a few and "dipped the plate, peaked the grid" on many an HF transmitter of olden times using such RF chokes. I see no theoretical reason why ferrite loaded chokes cannot be used as long as all of the design caveats are observed. I can only add that the Micrometals *free* toroid calculator incorporates approximate self-resonant frequencies in their program's calculations. Excellent program for toroidal inductor design...can't beat the price! :-) www.micrometals.com Problem is, if this is a restoration kind of project similar to old automobile restoration, toroidal forms won't do...just weren't many in the old transmitters of the 1950s and before. Anything of the same construction type is going to be an expensive special-order thing now. :-( |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lattice-wound RF choke replacement, 50 years later | Boatanchors | |||
"Within 15 years AM/FM radio will become a curiosity" | Broadcasting | |||
New Program - Coaxial Choke | Antenna | |||
BPL - UPLC ->Repeat the lie three times and claim it for truth | Policy | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy |