Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve H" wrote in message
... Looks a tad basic, http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/reader/07...56#reader-page "Polymath" wrote in message oups.com... ISBN 0-7506-9946-9 "RF Circuit Deign" By Chris Bowick This was recommended to me by my current employers (apparently the book is held in high regard in Japan). I only wish that I had come across it before. I have to agree Steve, a tad basic. Unless, of course, your employer has spotted you lack the basics. -- 73 Brian, G8OSN www.g8osn.org.uk |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now, what was that observation that Walt made?
Ah! Here it is..... Oh my. I've never encountered anyone else who is such a master of the thinly-veiled jibe and the "I'm superior to you" innuendo in every situation. Now, Brian, here's that opportunity for you to put your money where your mouth is.....which particular parts of the book do you "agree..... are a tad basic". Please reply within 2 minutes so that you don't have time to consult the book (perhaps for the very first time?), or else be seen for ever hereafter as a laughing stock, and a LIAR. As for employers who spot your deficiencies, who was the "south coast defence employer" who sacked you and as the result of which you couldn't get another job and had to go into teaching? ("Those that can, do. Thos that can't, teach, etc etc"?) Now, Brian, here's that opportunity for you to put your money where your mouth is..... Brian Reay wrote: I have to agree Steve, a tad basic. Unless, of course, your employer has spotted you lack the basics. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No reply from Brian Reay, who thus may be taken
as a liar and a bull****ter (if he wasn't so taken already). All mouth and trousers. Polymath wrote: Now, what was that observation that Walt made? Ah! Here it is..... Oh my. I've never encountered anyone else who is such a master of the thinly-veiled jibe and the "I'm superior to you" innuendo in every situation. Now, Brian, here's that opportunity for you to put your money where your mouth is.....which particular parts of the book do you "agree..... are a tad basic". Please reply within 2 minutes so that you don't have time to consult the book (perhaps for the very first time?), or else be seen for ever hereafter as a laughing stock, and a LIAR. As for employers who spot your deficiencies, who was the "south coast defence employer" who sacked you and as the result of which you couldn't get another job and had to go into teaching? ("Those that can, do. Thos that can't, teach, etc etc"?) Now, Brian, here's that opportunity for you to put your money where your mouth is..... Brian Reay wrote: I have to agree Steve, a tad basic. Unless, of course, your employer has spotted you lack the basics. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Polymath wrote:
No reply from Brian Reay, who thus may be taken as a liar and a bull****ter (if he wasn't so taken already). All mouth and trousers. We don't all have empty lives like you that enable us to sit and spout **** on the internet all day. Seeing Brian is a 'teacher', at least he has a career and not a job. Stupid Boy! Have you missed taking all of your lithium today perchance? WR. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Poxy mouth wrote:
Now, Brian, here's that opportunity for you to put your money where your mouth is.....which particular parts of the book do you "agree..... are a tad basic". Please reply within 2 minutes so that you don't have time to consult the book (perhaps for the very first time?), or else be seen for ever hereafter as a laughing stock, and a LIAR. How do you expect him to tell you which particular parts of the book he considers 'a tad basic' without consulting the book to quote chapter, page, paragraph etc.? Your post of 11:03 today describes it as '...full of concise info...', what does that suggest to you? ....(_!_)... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are a number of rather silly and infantile people
whose first inclination is to sneer. Two such intellectual failures are quoted below; "Empty vessels make the most noise". A book whose first page is about wire, the skin effect thereto, and the inductance of a short length of wire is not basic by any means. Brian Reay wrote: "Steve H" wrote in message ... Looks a tad basic, I have to agree Steve, a tad basic. Unless, of course, your employer has spotted you lack the basics. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Polymath" wrote in message
ups.com... There are a number of rather silly and infantile people whose first inclination is to sneer. Two such intellectual failures are quoted below; "Empty vessels make the most noise". A book whose first page is about wire, the skin effect thereto, and the inductance of a short length of wire is not basic by any means. You should already know all of the above after 30 years of hamming it up. Basic. Looks like a good book for anyone starting out in radio with a good basic education or a good crib sheet for the rest of us. Sitting in the sun with a half full vessel reading Traveling wave antennas by Carlton H Walter, includes an interesting discussion of the polyrod antenna ;c) Steve H |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Poxy mouth wrote:
A book whose first page is about wire, the skin effect thereto, and the inductance of a short length of wire is not basic by any means. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! If that's not basic I'd like to know what is. Is your knowledge so limited you see these as advanced subjects? Oh, why did I bother to ask? I know the answer. ....(_!_)... |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI" wrote in message
... Poxy mouth wrote: A book whose first page is about wire, the skin effect thereto, and the inductance of a short length of wire is not basic by any means. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! If that's not basic I'd like to know what is. I have to agree Frank, the fundamental reason why a wire has inductance is a very basic fact, I believe taught at KS3 science. Makes you wonder about degrees from the UoE, does it not? -- 73 Brian, G8OSN www.g8osn.org.uk |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now we know that you're a L.I.A.R. - the formula
to calculate the inductance of a short and straight piece of wire simply is not taught in schools. For someone who _BOASTS_ as much as you do about your self-perceived importance to the world of education, you are taking a very peculiar attitude to the recommendation for a book to take Radio Hams onwards. This should be an area for you to take a lead, but your behaviour is suggestive of a loser and not of a leader. Sour grapes, perhaps, that you did not make the recommendation yourself? Does this appalling mental derangement of yours feature in your behaviour in the classroom in Strood? Do you sneer in the same way towards your pupils? What if members of your school radio club were to read this NG, what would they think of you? What would they think of your cowardliness and laziness about the 12 WPM Morse test and the way in which you opted for a test aimed at 6-year-olds? Would you become as much a laughing stock in the school as you are on here? What would their parents think of you if they were to peruse the archives of this NG for the time that you were under training at a girls' school, of all places, and when you were publishing repeated offensive materials about sheep shagging? Would there be an outcry? I have described your behaviour to 3 people whom I know to be school teachers and shown them what you published. All, without exception, said that you are unsuitable to be a school teacher. Your rather silly and infantile sneering below is a further illustration of a sick, sick mind. Perhaps it is time that you resigned from teaching? Brian Reay wrote: "Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI" wrote in message ... Poxy mouth wrote: A book whose first page is about wire, the skin effect thereto, and the inductance of a short length of wire is not basic by any means. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! If that's not basic I'd like to know what is. I have to agree Frank, the fundamental reason why a wire has inductance is a very basic fact, I believe taught at KS3 science. Makes you wonder about degrees from the UoE, does it not? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
203 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (27-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
shortwv | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | CB | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Dx |