Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And the funny thing is, at a high load such as my GPS III+, those
alkalines with their capacity diminished by the high current draw still last longer than the NiMH that supposedly like high current draw. (I said the NiMH compare favorably, not that they outlast alkalines.) I agree with you, I've been playing aloud with numbers that don't always belong in the same arena. And too many other factors impinge; I save money using the NiMH in the GPS, but I'd kill them in flashlights that I routinely leave on and forget. And then there are those sulfated wet-cell batteries in the garage... *sigh* ================== I had the same experience with my ancient Garmin GPS 40 ;alkaline batts held longer than NiMHs. Possible reason is that alkalines cells are 1.5 V and NiMHs 1.2 V It is well possible that although the NiMHs are only considered discharged when the voltage has dropped to below 1 Volt (per cell) this voltage (or its multiple) is too low for the GPS to operate, whereas alkalines hold a higher voltage for a longer period. I noticed that when the GPS switched itself off when using NiMH batteries ,the cells apparently were not fully discharged. Using an automatic NiCad /NiMH charger operating with an initial discharge period as part of the overall cycle, it took quite a while ,before the NiMH cells were discharged before charging commenced. Frank GMØCSZ / KN6WH |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Highland Ham wrote:
================== I had the same experience with my ancient Garmin GPS 40 ;alkaline batts held longer than NiMHs. Possible reason is that alkalines cells are 1.5 V and NiMHs 1.2 V It is well possible that although the NiMHs are only considered discharged when the voltage has dropped to below 1 Volt (per cell) this voltage (or its multiple) is too low for the GPS to operate, whereas alkalines hold a higher voltage for a longer period. That's a common myth. Neither type has a constant voltage during discharge, but the NiMH is much more constant than alkaline. Try this experiment: Put a resistor across an alkaline cell to simulate roughly the load a GPS receiver would present. With a DVM, check the voltage every half hour or so, and continue until it reaches 0.8 - 0.9 volts, which is where it'll be when nearly all its energy is gone. You'll find that the "1.5" volt alkaline cell voltage will reach 1.25 volts (about the voltage of a NiMH cell for most of its discharge period) at a point where half or more of the cell's energy still remains. That is, the cell voltage will be below 1.25 volts for half or more of its life. If you repeat the test with a NiMH cell, you'll find that the cell voltage is 1.2 - 1.25 volts for nearly the whole discharge cycle. So for about half the time, the NiMH cell will have a higher voltage than the alkaline. Or, you could do it the easy way and look at the curves supplied by the manufacturers. They're readily available on the web. If a device quits working at a cell voltage of 1.0 volts, you'll get nearly all the energy from a NiMH cell, but you'll be throwing away an alkaline cell that still contains a significant amount of energy. I noticed that when the GPS switched itself off when using NiMH batteries ,the cells apparently were not fully discharged. Using an automatic NiCad /NiMH charger operating with an initial discharge period as part of the overall cycle, it took quite a while ,before the NiMH cells were discharged before charging commenced. Sounds like something was wrong with the GPS. If there was signficant energy left in the NiMH cells, it quit at a voltage greater than 1.0 volt/cell. And if it did that when using alkaline cells, you'd be throwing away an even bigger fraction of its total energy than with a NiMH cell. There are several reasons why NiMH cells might not do as well as they should. One is that chargers will often shut down well before the cells are fully charged. This is particularly common with new NiMH cells, until they've been cycled a half dozen times or so. Another potential problem is voltage depression, mistakenly called "memory". This can be cured by a full discharge to 1.0 volt/cell then recharge. Cells also have less capacity after long storage or a history of light use and recharge. Several cycles are necessary to restore full capacity. And of course, modern NiMH cells at 2500 mAh or more have a lot more capacity than earlier ones which were as little as 1300 mAh or so -- if you did a comparison some time ago, things have changed since. A number of fast chargers don't charge cells to their full capacity. Finally, a substantial portion of some cells' capacity originates in the marketing department -- tests I've run show the capacity of some to be pretty badly inflated (Lenmar is a common brand that comes to mind). They do take some care and feeding -- if it's too much of a hassle, alkaline cells are a solution. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Roy ,Tnx for your comments ; I'll do some tests with NiMH cells using a 'Maha C777Plus' discharger/(pulse)charger and check capacity . I'll repeat the discharge/charge process a few times to see whether capacity changes. I realise that automatic chargers charging at a high current might not charge any cell to its maximum capacity, that's why I shall also charge the cell at a lower rate using a LM317 constant current circuit. with the Maha device the cell's capacity is indicated following the completion of a discharge period from fully charged to a threshold of just below 1 Volt I knew that brand new cells only get their full capacity after having been cycled a number of times. BTW : NiCads and NiMHs I use regularly are kept in good condition by constant trickle charging at a few mA , again ,with a LM317 constant current circuit ,because specially NiMH cells have a relatively high self-discharge rate. Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH There are several reasons why NiMH cells might not do as well as they should. One is that chargers will often shut down well before the cells are fully charged. This is particularly common with new NiMH cells, until they've been cycled a half dozen times or so. Another potential problem is voltage depression, mistakenly called "memory". This can be cured by a full discharge to 1.0 volt/cell then recharge. Cells also have less capacity after long storage or a history of light use and recharge. Several cycles are necessary to restore full capacity. And of course, modern NiMH cells at 2500 mAh or more have a lot more capacity than earlier ones which were as little as 1300 mAh or so -- if you did a comparison some time ago, things have changed since. A number of fast chargers don't charge cells to their full capacity. Finally, a substantial portion of some cells' capacity originates in the marketing department -- tests I've run show the capacity of some to be pretty badly inflated (Lenmar is a common brand that comes to mind). They do take some care and feeding -- if it's too much of a hassle, alkaline cells are a solution. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
MAHA MH-C777PlusII MAHA MH-C777 battery reconditioner recommendation? | General | |||
Yaesu VX-2R memory and battery question | Equipment | |||
Are Alincos Throw-Away Radios? (Finding a DJ-C5 Battery) | Equipment | |||
Are Alincos Throw-Away Radios? (Finding a DJ-C5 Battery) | Equipment | |||
FS/FT Commercial VHF/UHF & Test Gear - Long List | Swap |