Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 8th 05, 09:24 AM
Paul Keinanen
 
Posts: n/a
Default High-insulation 1:1 wideband transformer?

On 7 Nov 2005 14:00:56 -0800, "SpamHog" wrote:

I am very tempted to use either a toroid or a couple of ferrite rods
with 1:1 windings made of... spark plug wire?! The stuff takes 30kV
pulses without even blinking, If I use non-resistive type, an
appropriate container, and keep it all dry, breakdown voltage between
incoming and outgoing coax could exceed 50kV. A low-ohm, low-Z
grounding could help ensure that it's not easily exceeded.


The real question is the grounding impedance.

You might even be able to measure the grounding resistance at DC or
50/60 Hz, but measuring the grounding impedance at a few hundred kHz
might be a bit problematic. Assuming the direct lightning hit is about
10-30 kA, a grounding impedance of only 1 ohm would create a potential
difference of 10-30 kV.

I do not know your mains wiring practises, but assuming that a
separate mains grounding electrode is used for each house, the
grounding impedance should be measured between the antenna ground and
house ground. If not, the grounding impedance should be measured
against some distant point.

Assuming that the house has a separate grounding electrode and your
antenna will get a hit, which is conducted to ground. Due to the
finite ground resistance, the house grounding electrode will move to
an elevated potential (several kV) compared to the surrounding (mains
neutral, telephone and CATV).

Thus, I think that the 50 kV isolation between your antenna and
receiver is more than enough and I would guess that more damage would
be caused due to the mains neutral, telephone and CATV connections to
your equipment.

Paul OH3LWR

  #2   Report Post  
Old November 9th 05, 11:17 AM
SpamHog
 
Posts: n/a
Default High-insulation 1:1 wideband transformer?

Paul,

You make some interesting points.

The real question is the grounding impedance.
measuring the grounding impedance at a few hundred kHz
might be a bit problematic.


Most sources claim the energy is concentrated between DC and a few tens
of kHz. This means that impedance is an issue, but not a terrible one.
Typical faraday cages (few make lightning "rods" anymore...) are
anything but low impedance, yet thick enough to take 100kA without
melting.

Assuming the direct lightning hit is about 10-30 kA,
a grounding impedance of only 1 ohm would create
a potential difference of 10-30 kV.


Right. Perhaps even worse on the high end of the spectrum.

the grounding impedance should be measured
between the antenna ground and house ground.


This reminds me of a web page from your corner of Europe:
http://www.kolumbus.fi/oh5iy/back/Ham%20Radio.html

The take-home point is that one wants all sensitive equipment (and
people) to be on a high-insulation, high-impedance branch of a
multipath graph, while bolt energy is offered a low-insulation,
low-impedance branch to run through.

There are interesting implications:
Assuming that the house has a separate grounding electrode [...]
due to the finite ground resistance, the house grounding electrode
will move to an elevated potential (several kV) compared to the surrounding
mains neutral, telephone and CATV).


Not necessarily. If grounds are separate, inter-groundpoint resistance
will if anything decrease the risk of such an transient. If there was
a single grounding point, and ground resistance were high, there would
be a greater risk of the grounding point becoming a source of common
mode transient towards the land lines.

In my case, my shack is at the ground floor of a 9-story building, the
antenna is on top, and all grounds are pretty heavy duty and bonded -
but not low impedance. The risk for the land lines would be about the
same w/ or w/o my puny 20m-long T2FD. (The Other Guy has a 35ft self
supporting lattice with tribander, 4x15 @ 144, 3x32 @ 430, 2m dish @
1296, weather turnstyle, 40/80 dipoles, collinear @ 144, and a 6m
moonbounce dish @ 430. When I added the T2FD nobody noticed).

As for the DC block, I think I found the right container and location.
A 1 - meter PVC pipe that will hang horizontally under a roof edge less
than 2m from the flue lines. Pipe and coax can tiptoe away from the
chimney in a environment that stays dry when it rains.

  #3   Report Post  
Old November 9th 05, 02:42 PM
Paul Keinanen
 
Posts: n/a
Default High-insulation 1:1 wideband transformer?

On 9 Nov 2005 03:17:47 -0800, "SpamHog" wrote:

In my case, my shack is at the ground floor of a 9-story building, the
antenna is on top, and all grounds are pretty heavy duty and bonded -
but not low impedance.


I had assumed that you lived on the ground level and had the antenna
feed point somewhere further in the garden.

In your actual case, assuming that the separate grounding wires come
directly down from the roof and connected to the grounding of your
apartment at the ground level and assuming that the lightning bolt
rise time would be 1 kA/us. A thick wire has an inductance about 1
uH/m, thus, there would be a voltage gradient about 1 kV/m along the
grounding wire. If the antenna system grounding wire from the roof is
30 m long, the isolation transformer primary side potential would be
30 kV above the building neutral bar and also 30 kV above your
apartment potential as well as 30 kV above the isolation transformer
secondary. The building ground bar potential will be somewhere above
the average potential of the surrounding countryside.

With 50 kV isolation at the transformer, nearly 2 kA/us rise times
could be tolerated. To reduce the grounding wire inductance, several
grounding wires would be required well separated from each other.

Paul OH3LWR

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
350 tons of high explosives looted during early US occupation dxAce Shortwave 9 October 26th 04 06:33 PM
Announcing 'hifi-am', to discuss High Fidelity AM tuners and hobbyist transmitters Jon Noring Shortwave 7 July 10th 04 06:24 AM
FA: >> MOTOROLA MCS-2000 VHF HIGH POWER TYPE II RADIO<< JKLEIN1050 Swap 0 December 29th 03 08:07 AM
FA >>>MOTOROLA MCS-2000 VHF HIGH POWER TYPE II RADIO<<< JKLEIN1050 Swap 0 December 29th 03 12:37 AM
FA: MOTOROLA MCS-2000 HIGH PWR VHF E Bay : 2583254022 JKLEIN1050 Swap 0 December 23rd 03 11:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017