Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Nov 2005 14:00:56 -0800, "SpamHog" wrote:
I am very tempted to use either a toroid or a couple of ferrite rods with 1:1 windings made of... spark plug wire?! The stuff takes 30kV pulses without even blinking, If I use non-resistive type, an appropriate container, and keep it all dry, breakdown voltage between incoming and outgoing coax could exceed 50kV. A low-ohm, low-Z grounding could help ensure that it's not easily exceeded. The real question is the grounding impedance. You might even be able to measure the grounding resistance at DC or 50/60 Hz, but measuring the grounding impedance at a few hundred kHz might be a bit problematic. Assuming the direct lightning hit is about 10-30 kA, a grounding impedance of only 1 ohm would create a potential difference of 10-30 kV. I do not know your mains wiring practises, but assuming that a separate mains grounding electrode is used for each house, the grounding impedance should be measured between the antenna ground and house ground. If not, the grounding impedance should be measured against some distant point. Assuming that the house has a separate grounding electrode and your antenna will get a hit, which is conducted to ground. Due to the finite ground resistance, the house grounding electrode will move to an elevated potential (several kV) compared to the surrounding (mains neutral, telephone and CATV). Thus, I think that the 50 kV isolation between your antenna and receiver is more than enough and I would guess that more damage would be caused due to the mains neutral, telephone and CATV connections to your equipment. Paul OH3LWR |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul,
You make some interesting points. The real question is the grounding impedance. measuring the grounding impedance at a few hundred kHz might be a bit problematic. Most sources claim the energy is concentrated between DC and a few tens of kHz. This means that impedance is an issue, but not a terrible one. Typical faraday cages (few make lightning "rods" anymore...) are anything but low impedance, yet thick enough to take 100kA without melting. Assuming the direct lightning hit is about 10-30 kA, a grounding impedance of only 1 ohm would create a potential difference of 10-30 kV. Right. Perhaps even worse on the high end of the spectrum. the grounding impedance should be measured between the antenna ground and house ground. This reminds me of a web page from your corner of Europe: http://www.kolumbus.fi/oh5iy/back/Ham%20Radio.html The take-home point is that one wants all sensitive equipment (and people) to be on a high-insulation, high-impedance branch of a multipath graph, while bolt energy is offered a low-insulation, low-impedance branch to run through. There are interesting implications: Assuming that the house has a separate grounding electrode [...] due to the finite ground resistance, the house grounding electrode will move to an elevated potential (several kV) compared to the surrounding mains neutral, telephone and CATV). Not necessarily. If grounds are separate, inter-groundpoint resistance will if anything decrease the risk of such an transient. If there was a single grounding point, and ground resistance were high, there would be a greater risk of the grounding point becoming a source of common mode transient towards the land lines. In my case, my shack is at the ground floor of a 9-story building, the antenna is on top, and all grounds are pretty heavy duty and bonded - but not low impedance. The risk for the land lines would be about the same w/ or w/o my puny 20m-long T2FD. (The Other Guy has a 35ft self supporting lattice with tribander, 4x15 @ 144, 3x32 @ 430, 2m dish @ 1296, weather turnstyle, 40/80 dipoles, collinear @ 144, and a 6m moonbounce dish @ 430. When I added the T2FD nobody noticed). As for the DC block, I think I found the right container and location. A 1 - meter PVC pipe that will hang horizontally under a roof edge less than 2m from the flue lines. Pipe and coax can tiptoe away from the chimney in a environment that stays dry when it rains. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Nov 2005 03:17:47 -0800, "SpamHog" wrote:
In my case, my shack is at the ground floor of a 9-story building, the antenna is on top, and all grounds are pretty heavy duty and bonded - but not low impedance. I had assumed that you lived on the ground level and had the antenna feed point somewhere further in the garden. In your actual case, assuming that the separate grounding wires come directly down from the roof and connected to the grounding of your apartment at the ground level and assuming that the lightning bolt rise time would be 1 kA/us. A thick wire has an inductance about 1 uH/m, thus, there would be a voltage gradient about 1 kV/m along the grounding wire. If the antenna system grounding wire from the roof is 30 m long, the isolation transformer primary side potential would be 30 kV above the building neutral bar and also 30 kV above your apartment potential as well as 30 kV above the isolation transformer secondary. The building ground bar potential will be somewhere above the average potential of the surrounding countryside. With 50 kV isolation at the transformer, nearly 2 kA/us rise times could be tolerated. To reduce the grounding wire inductance, several grounding wires would be required well separated from each other. Paul OH3LWR |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|