RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Homebrew (https://www.radiobanter.com/homebrew/)
-   -   FAQ - revised version (https://www.radiobanter.com/homebrew/84773-faq-revised-version.html)

Pierian Spring December 24th 05 10:08 AM

FAQ - revised version
 
You are a LIAR.

I have _NEVER belittled any "of the hard work and enthusiasm
shown by various members of" your "scout group"

I did not even know that you had a scout troop.

But since you raise the issue, if they are, indeed, scouts
and are over the age of 11 years, and they have had to put
in "hard work" to pass an exam intended for 6-year-olds,
then they are not achievers but retards.

wrote:
Or because I objected to
your belittlement of the hard work and enthusiasm shown by various
members of our scout group?



Brian Reay December 24th 05 10:18 AM

Bringing Wood & Douglas into Disrepute
 

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 09:02:00 GMT, "Brian Reay"
wrote:

"Walt Davidson" wrote:
On 23 Dec 2005 16:57:21 -0800, wrote:

It's a shame, but the reality is that us radio hams are congenital
tightwads!

It is significant, is it not, that the only people who make this
allegation are those who have been involved (or still are) in the
business of making money out of selling equipment to the said "radio
hams". I have heard this complaint innumerable times from failed
amateur radio traders ... with whom this country is awash.


You don't listen to many amateur then Walt. A definite trait of the radio
amateur is "short arms and deep pockets"- a positive trait in my view but
still worthy of a bit of mirth. I like a bargain as much as the next man
and
(re)using a bit of "junk" to repair or make something is far more pleasing
than flashing the credit card.


I quite agree, Brian ... but there is a world of difference between
being "a congenital tightwad" and merely being a prudent spender!



Surely the best accolade a "prudent spender" can receive is to be called "a
congenital tightwad" ;-)

--
73
Brian
www.g8osn.org.uk




Pierian Spring December 24th 05 10:24 AM

Bringing Wood & Douglas into Disrepute
 
If you do not wish for there to be a right of reply, then you
would be better served if you do not contribute at all.

I did not say that you do not live up to my "ideal radio amateur";
in fact, I do not even use the term.

To the contrary, from what you have posted recently, you do
seem to be a _REAL_ Radio Ham in (most of) the best
traditions thereto.

A Merry (Belated) Solstice to you, also.

G4ZWI wrote:
If I am in error, sir, I will stand corrected. I believe, however, most
people following this thread would conclude your post 89 was directed
to me, as I did.
I am sorry if I do not live up to your ideal radio amateur, and wish
you once again,
Merry Christmas.
(Please do not respond to this post, as I have no intention of
following this thread further)
Fred Cooper G4ZWI



DieSea December 24th 05 10:57 AM

Bringing Wood & Douglas into Disrepute
 


73 de G3NYY [VERY careful with his money!]



Ok Wlat

Sew you showed the ScotchMan how to weld his sporran up

And Super glue for the Yorkshiremans wallet to boot

Happy Crimbo All

Well to all that's not in my KillFile

DieSea



Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI December 24th 05 11:52 AM

FAQ - revised version
 
Pierian Spring of verbal diarrhoea wrote:
But since you raise the issue, if they are, indeed, scouts
and are over the age of 11 years, and they have had to put
in "hard work" to pass an exam intended for 6-year-olds,
then they are not achievers but retards.

and since, I believe, _YOU_ sat the RAE when in your twenties what does
that make _YOU_ ? A super retard?
To use your words, 'GROW UP, MR EVANS.'
Alternatively, FOAD.
....(_!_)...

Mike Clayton December 24th 05 01:20 PM

Bringing Wood & Douglas into Disrepute
 
In message .co
Don't you realise how silly and ridiculous you make yourself
look, by indulging in what are essentially very infantile
abusive tirades in an international forum that is broadcast to
the whole world?


Perhaps you should ask yourself the same question?
--
Mike Clayton
'For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothing'
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mike_clayton


[email protected] December 24th 05 03:18 PM

FAQ - revised version
 

Pierian Spring wrote:
You are a LIAR.

I have _NEVER belittled any "of the hard work and enthusiasm
shown by various members of" your "scout group"


Really? Which pathetic sociopath wrote, and continues to spam various
newsgroups with, this bitter and twisted little piece of prose then?

"Remember - A sure sign of a CB Radio hobbyist is if he holds,
or has ever held, a licence issued under the gangrenous
degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme! "

It was you, wasn't it Gareth?

73
Mike G4KFK


[email protected] December 24th 05 03:26 PM

FAQ - revised version
 

wrote:
Really? Which pathetic sociopath wrote, and continues to spam various


Definition of a sociopath, for those who were wondering:
Diagnostic criteria (DSM-IV-TR)
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, a widely
used manual for diagnosing mental and behavioral disorders (see also:
DSM cautionary statement), defines antisocial personality disorder as a
pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of
others occurring since age 15 years, as indicated by three (or more) of
the following:
- failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors
as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
- deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or
conning others for personal profit or pleasure
- impulsivity or failure to plan ahead
- irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical
fights or assaults
reckless disregard for safety of self or others
- consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to
sustain steady work or honor financial obligations
- lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or
rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another

73
Mike G4KFK


Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI December 24th 05 04:04 PM

Bringing Wood & Douglas into Disrepute
 
on 23/12/2005 21:52 Me said the following:
Pierian Spring wrote:

At one time, Wood & Douglas was a respectable supplier



At one time I wonder if this company was respectable

OUT & ABOUT SYSTEMS LTD
13 HARDENS CLOSE
CHIPPENHAM WILTSHIRE
SN153AA

Std. Industrial Classification (SIC):7372 Prepackaged software
72.20 COMPUTER SERVICES
Turnover:0
Profit:0
Networth:0
Employees:0
Company Registration Number:3144797

http://tinyurl.com/as56c
I wonder what Company he's using for his sub-contracting in Portsmouth,
and what tax arrangements have Bean made?
--
;-)
73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
http://turner-smith.co.uk

[email protected] December 24th 05 04:24 PM

Bringing Chippenham in Disrepute
 

Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI wrote:
on 23/12/2005 21:52 Me said the following:
http://tinyurl.com/as56c
I wonder what Company he's using for his sub-contracting in Portsmouth,
and what tax arrangements have Bean made?


That was worth £2.00 !!!

If anybody would like a Micro$oft RTF format copy of the Company Report
and Accounts, please email me at

But don't expect a reply tomorrow, as it's Xmas!

73
Mike G4KFK



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com