Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, that is certainly a vote for UC. Do you also have an opinion of
the other idea, using pre-patterned, pre-etched boards such as Veroboard and the like? My own feeling, for what it's worth, is that these are pretty good for DC and audio-frequency projects, but can have problems at RF. A big part of the issue is one of grounding. Many of the pre-etched proto boards I've seen use most of their real estate for pads and pad-connection strips. There are usually sets of traces for supplying power and ground to the components, but these don't use more than a relatively small amount of the board's copper area and are often run as long strips coming in from the side of the board. As a result, if you have two groups of components which are physically fairly close together, and connect components in these groups to the physically-closest ground pads/strips (minimizing the lead length), you may find that there are actually quite a few inches of PC-board ground trace between one component's "grounded" lead and another. This is usually adequate at DC and audio frequency. At RF, the parasitic inductance of those long looping ground traces can have an adverse effect on the circuit's stability. You can sometimes minimize this by using a star-grounding approach, but since the connection pads are pre-etched into clusters and strips there's likely to be a limit to the number of components that you can connect to a "single point" ground, and it may not be all that good an approximation of a true single-point. One of the recipes for making stable, friendly, and reproducible designs at RF seems to be to minimize the impact of parasitic reactances. As you point out, using "ugly" construction of the Manhattan or free-air (point-to-point) variety minimizes parasitic capacitance between components, and between components and the board. It also has the benefit of minimizing parasitic _inductive_ reactance in the circuit's "ground", if you use a solid copper ground plane as the basis for your construction. "Ground" is always an approximation... a perfect ground cannot be achieved at either DC or RF... but you can get closer if you have lots of copper area to work with. Etched PC boards can be used quite successfully for RF projects, of course, and often are. It's important, when laying out such a board, to minimize unwanted parasitics... leaving large sections of un-etched copper for grounding, using wide traces, paying attention to where the actual ground currents flow, adding ground-shield traces between any signal-carrying traces that might tend to suffer from cross-coupling, and so forth. One usually does not have the luxury of being able to take advantage of these techniques (at least to their fullest) when using a pre-etched proto board, -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Swap | |||
ground plane for a magnetic mount cellular antenna | Antenna | |||
Grounding Rod | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |