LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4   Report Post  
Old December 30th 05, 07:26 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Dave Platt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ground Plane construction vs pre-printed "protoboards"

Well, that is certainly a vote for UC. Do you also have an opinion of
the other idea, using pre-patterned, pre-etched boards such as
Veroboard and the like?


My own feeling, for what it's worth, is that these are pretty good for
DC and audio-frequency projects, but can have problems at RF.

A big part of the issue is one of grounding. Many of the pre-etched
proto boards I've seen use most of their real estate for pads and
pad-connection strips. There are usually sets of traces for supplying
power and ground to the components, but these don't use more than a
relatively small amount of the board's copper area and are often
run as long strips coming in from the side of the board.

As a result, if you have two groups of components which are physically
fairly close together, and connect components in these groups to the
physically-closest ground pads/strips (minimizing the lead length),
you may find that there are actually quite a few inches of PC-board
ground trace between one component's "grounded" lead and another.

This is usually adequate at DC and audio frequency. At RF, the
parasitic inductance of those long looping ground traces can have an
adverse effect on the circuit's stability. You can sometimes minimize
this by using a star-grounding approach, but since the connection pads
are pre-etched into clusters and strips there's likely to be a limit
to the number of components that you can connect to a "single point"
ground, and it may not be all that good an approximation of a true
single-point.

One of the recipes for making stable, friendly, and reproducible
designs at RF seems to be to minimize the impact of parasitic
reactances. As you point out, using "ugly" construction of the
Manhattan or free-air (point-to-point) variety minimizes parasitic
capacitance between components, and between components and the board.

It also has the benefit of minimizing parasitic _inductive_ reactance
in the circuit's "ground", if you use a solid copper ground plane as
the basis for your construction. "Ground" is always an
approximation... a perfect ground cannot be achieved at either DC or
RF... but you can get closer if you have lots of copper area to work
with.

Etched PC boards can be used quite successfully for RF projects, of
course, and often are. It's important, when laying out such a board,
to minimize unwanted parasitics... leaving large sections of un-etched
copper for grounding, using wide traces, paying attention to where the
actual ground currents flow, adding ground-shield traces between any
signal-carrying traces that might tend to suffer from cross-coupling,
and so forth.

One usually does not have the luxury of being able to take advantage
of these techniques (at least to their fullest) when using a
pre-etched proto board,

--
Dave Platt AE6EO
Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter Stephen G. Gulyas Swap 17 December 7th 04 06:42 PM
ground plane for a magnetic mount cellular antenna isaac Antenna 7 July 13th 04 04:51 PM
Grounding Rod Alan J Giddings Shortwave 21 January 21st 04 10:10 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017