Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 Dec 2005 09:32:25 -0800, "Basil B." wrote:
Hello all I've been doing a fair bit of internet reading about RF construction projects. I'm still confused about something. Most authors, including those in the ARRL Handbook, seem to espouse "ugly construction" and a variant called Manhatten construction. I understand that the reason is that these techniques minimize capacitance by providing a large ground plane. Ugly construction seems to also encompass perfboard construction with wire traces or direct component-to-component connections. This seems to me to be not much better than using pre-printed boards whose traces match, in geometry, those of solderless prototyping boards. I do understand that the solderless boards are inadequate for RF work, but are the pre-printed perforated "protoboards" also inadequate. Call it an OC tendency, but ugly construction is, well, ugly. Of course, I want to use the best techniques for what I'm doing, and if UC is the way to go, then that's what I'll do. I'd appreciate your opinions on this. Thanks Basil B. I've done carfully constructed dead bug (ugly) RF hardware that works well at 2.4ghz and is not ugly It's a very effective techniques and with modest care it's difficult to do better with etched circuits at VHF or higher. Some of my best radios and test gear have been built this way and some test items are now several decades old. It can be very rugged as well. Allison KB!gmx |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've done carefully constructed dead bug (ugly) RF hardware that works
well at 2.4ghz and is not ugly It's a very effective techniques and with modest care it's difficult to do better with etched circuits at VHF or higher. Some of my best radios and test gear have been built this way and some test items are now several decades old. It can be very rugged as well. ============================ Ugly construction can in fact be very neat. I normally use double sided PCB and drill holes to suit such that components to be grounded can be fitted perpendicular directly to the board without wire ends. These then also serve as support for non-grounded components. If non-grounded components are on their own I fit 10 MOhm resistors as 'practical stand-off insulators'. Where inductance is a critical element I use metal film resistors for this duty ,but normally carbon film resistors are fine. All board mounted components are soldered to board on both sides such that both copper sides are bonded at various places. Integrated circuit are glued 'dead bug style' with ample opportunity to connect other components. For VHF and higher I line the board edges with folded very thin copper strip. I am fortunate having found a roll with 6mm wide strip with a total length sufficient 'for life', at a flea market. Frank KN6WH / GM0CSZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Swap | |||
ground plane for a magnetic mount cellular antenna | Antenna | |||
Grounding Rod | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |