Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was just that they are dirt cheap and available.
I'll pony up for real ones. JE |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 23:38:29 -0500, JE wrote:
It was just that they are dirt cheap and available. I'll pony up for real ones. JE I'd go with try it first. Also base collector junction of many transistors is fairly decent varactor. Low power transistors tend to be low capacitance and the amount of capacitance increases with device dies size (power level). Allison |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dr. G,
You are correct, but many circuits have used the 1N4000 series diodes as varactors with acceptable results. Any diode is a varactor (even transistor junctions), but those called varactors are just optimized for and measured/spec'ed as variable caps. If the cap value works in the circuit and losses/noise/whatever-else aren't a problem, then no problem. I chalk it up to: Some of us don't have the luxury of either well stocked basements or pocket books, or perhaps the willingness to run out to the local parts store (if you have one) and pick something out just to throw some neat little thingy together. Don't (some) zeners generate noise???...or is that only near the breakdown reigion? 73, Steve, K.9/D;C'I "Dr. Grok" wrote in message ... Maybe I'm confusing this with something else but I always thought 1N4007's were 1000 V PIV, 1 A rectifiers. I believe "any" diode has varactor characteristics to some extent but if you need a varactor you'd be better off using one designed as a varactor. Dr. G. In article , JE wrote: The common 1N4007 seem to work for HF but what is the max. frequency they can be used as varactors? And how about zener diodes? JE |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Nosko wrote:
. . . Don't (some) zeners generate noise???...or is that only near the breakdown reigion? Some are very noisy. The noisiest I've seen have been ones in the 12 - 15 volt range when biased at considerably less than a mA. I've used one, followed by a 50 ohm amplifier "pill" IC, as a broadband noise source to see filter responses with a spectrum analyzer. The noise is easily visible well up into the UHF region. But all zeners generate some noise, so you have to use appropriate filtering in sensitive applications. In my experience, though, band gap references can be even noisier than a typical zener. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy ...
I've been playing around (ahem, excuse me, heuristically engineering) with zener noise sources for a while using the same spectrum analyzer trick and as yet I haven't been able to make the noise as "flat" across the passband as I'd like. I've tried varying the bias, the voltage, and a few other tricks, but as yet, no joy. Can you shed some light on what you've found to make the noise power/voltage fairly level across the band? Jim Some are very noisy. The noisiest I've seen have been ones in the 12 - 15 volt range when biased at considerably less than a mA. I've used one, followed by a 50 ohm amplifier "pill" IC, as a broadband noise source to see filter responses with a spectrum analyzer. The noise is easily visible well up into the UHF region. But all zeners generate some noise, so you have to use appropriate filtering in sensitive applications. In my experience, though, band gap references can be even noisier than a typical zener. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RST Engineering wrote:
Roy ... I've been playing around (ahem, excuse me, heuristically engineering) with zener noise sources for a while using the same spectrum analyzer trick and as yet I haven't been able to make the noise as "flat" across the passband as I'd like. I've tried varying the bias, the voltage, and a few other tricks, but as yet, no joy. Can you shed some light on what you've found to make the noise power/voltage fairly level across the band? It's not particularly flat over the whole band, and I haven't attempted to make it be. My interest has been mostly in relatively narrow band filters, or the shape of a main filter rolloff. The noise is adequately flat over the bandwidths I've been interested in. It's been a while since I've fooled with it, but as I recall, the shape of the noise spectral distribution changed all over the map as I changed the diode bias. I imagine that it changes with temperature and with individual diodes, too. So any circuit used to flatten it would only work for a particular diode, current, and probably temperature. The bottom line is that it's probably a lousy way to try to generate a flat broadband noise spectrum. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RST Engineering wrote...
Roy ... I've been playing around (ahem, excuse me, heuristically engineering) with zener noise sources for a while using the same spectrum analyzer trick and as yet I haven't been able to make the noise as "flat" across the passband as I'd like. I've tried varying the bias, the voltage, and a few other tricks, but as yet, no joy. Can you shed some light on what you've found to make the noise power/voltage fairly level across the band? Good zener noise sources are carefully bred and tested, they do _not_ come naturally from garden-variety zener diodes. I suggest you go read the hundred or so messages in the famous zener oscillation thread a few years back here on s.e.d. In this you'll learn of my substantial investigations into the topic, some physics - and, very important, learn what a zener microplasma is. You'll see my ASCII waveform plots of actual bench measurements showing exactly what's going on. After all this you may decide to avoid using zener diodes for calibrated noise sources. Sorry about that! -- Thanks, - Win |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RST Engineering wrote:
Roy ... I've been playing around (ahem, excuse me, heuristically engineering) with zener noise sources for a while using the same spectrum analyzer trick and as yet I haven't been able to make the noise as "flat" across the passband as I'd like. I've tried varying the bias, the voltage, and a few other tricks, but as yet, no joy. Can you shed some light on what you've found to make the noise power/voltage fairly level across the band? Jim Some are very noisy. The noisiest I've seen have been ones in the 12 - 15 volt range when biased at considerably less than a mA. I've used one, followed by a 50 ohm amplifier "pill" IC, as a broadband noise source to see filter responses with a spectrum analyzer. The noise is easily visible well up into the UHF region. But all zeners generate some noise, so you have to use appropriate filtering in sensitive applications. In my experience, though, band gap references can be even noisier than a typical zener. Roy Lewallen, W7EL What I did for some project which needed equal amplitude uncorrelated noise,is amplify the zener noise with a wide band video opamp,with high pass and lowpass filtering. Used the low pass as input for a zero cross detector, delayed the zerocrossing 10 microseconds,and used that for clock to a circulating bit in a shift register. each parallel output of that register controlled a sample/hold opamp,sampling the highpass signal. Voila!! 8 audio frequency, non-correlated noise sources. The zerocrossing clock was made this way,to avoid detectable clock tones int the output.(2 to 20 microsec between crossings) the 10 microsecond delay was used to get a voltage at the sample and hold opamp which was not correlated to the zerocrossing. If you need only one signal ,leave out the shift register, and just use a 10 and a 1 microsec. oneshot for the s/h opamp clock. The application? A wind and engine noise generator for a car simulator. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:30:01 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote: Roy ... I've been playing around (ahem, excuse me, heuristically engineering) with zener noise sources for a while using the same spectrum analyzer trick and as yet I haven't been able to make the noise as "flat" across the passband as I'd like. I've tried varying the bias, the voltage, and a few other tricks, but as yet, no joy. Can you shed some light on what you've found to make the noise power/voltage fairly level across the band? Jim Some are very noisy. The noisiest I've seen have been ones in the 12 - 15 volt range when biased at considerably less than a mA. I've used one, followed by a 50 ohm amplifier "pill" IC, as a broadband noise source to see filter responses with a spectrum analyzer. The noise is easily visible well up into the UHF region. But all zeners generate some noise, so you have to use appropriate filtering in sensitive applications. In my experience, though, band gap references can be even noisier than a typical zener. Roy Lewallen, W7EL These folks will sell you serious noise diodes... http://www.noisecom.com/NC/default.htm John |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zeners are also often used as noise sources, which might be a good reason NOT
to use them for the tuning, especially in a receiver. Dr. G. In article , Roy Lewallen wrote: Ken Scharf wrote: All diodes exhibit varactor and zener traits but not all are stable as such. All diodes when reverse biased exhibit a value of capacitance across them. In most cases it's usually quite small, less than 5 to 10pf. Increase the reverse bias and the capacitance goes down. At very high frequencies the capacitance change is enough to make a useful tuning diode. If you need a varactor to work at medium to high frequencies the tuning effect won't be very useful and you should use a true varactor diode. Such diodes have either larger areas, or thinner substrates to increase th capacitance. . . . Zener diodes have much more capacitance than this, with the amount of C being greater as the zener voltage gets lower. It's been a long time since I've looked at this, but as I recall you can get well over 100 pF from something like a 5 V zener. For the same reason, reverse biased E-B junctions can give quite a bit of C. Of course, the limited breakdown voltage limits your tuning range. Higher power zeners have higher C yet. I've used zeners for varicaps many times in HF rigs, to offset a VFO when switching bands, and for RIT. Haven't tried one as the main tuning capacitor, but I haven't tried a regular varicap, either. Diodes specified for varicap use have more predictable capacitance-vs-voltage characteristics, and you can get a variety of different characteristics. They might have lower noise, too, but I've never used one in an application where that was critical, so don't know if that's the case. But for a lot of one-off projects, zeners work fine as varicaps. As for using something else as zeners, emitter-base junctions work well. You don't get much variety, though -- most break down at around 5-6 volts. I've got a power supply I built over 30 years ago which uses a couple of series transistor E-B junctions as the voltage reference. It's still my main bench supply. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Electronic tuning (high voltage varactors) | Homebrew |