Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't vouchesafe John's decision to give up his treasured gear,
but I can say John's loss is my gain. John's 8566B is a beautiful machine and several of us are having lots of fun with it. My tech is making a new rack for it (and several other machines, together far too big to fit on a bench), then I'll add an ethernet-to-GPIB network connection, software, and it'll be ready for prime time. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Glad to hear it's working well. Agreed, its size and weight is a real
problem, and not just for shipping. I'll definitely own another of those beasts at some point, when I have more room than I do now. The important thing is that it's in appreciative hands. :-) If you plan to use my GPIB software with it, be sure to download a recent copy. I hosed the phase-noise app pretty badly in my last "slipstream" update a few weeks ago, and only heard about it last week. The version that's up there now is fine. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would you be so kind as to post the url for your website? I would like to
get a copy of your software. Thanks, K wrote in message ups.com... Glad to hear it's working well. Agreed, its size and weight is a real problem, and not just for shipping. I'll definitely own another of those beasts at some point, when I have more room than I do now. The important thing is that it's in appreciative hands. :-) If you plan to use my GPIB software with it, be sure to download a recent copy. I hosed the phase-noise app pretty badly in my last "slipstream" update a few weeks ago, and only heard about it last week. The version that's up there now is fine. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would you be so kind as to post the url for your website?
I would like to get a copy of your software. See the first link at http://www.qsl.net/ke5fx/ (or download the setup program directly at http://www.speakeasy.org/~jmiles1/ke5fx/gpib/setup.exe ). |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote...
If you plan to use my GPIB software with it, be sure to download a recent copy. I hosed the phase-noise app pretty badly in my last "slipstream" update a few weeks ago, and only heard about it last week. The version that's up there now is fine. http://www.qsl.net/ke5fx/ Thanks for the heads-up. That's v1.05, the Jan 14, 2006 edition? Which program was updated to fix the phase-noise problem? The pn program's source code says 13-Jul-05, although the pn.cpp file date is 12-Feb-06. I like the part where you get the "number of 1000-ns intervals since 1-Jan-1601 UTC" :-) -- Thanks, - Win |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Winfield Hill wrote:
http://www.qsl.net/ke5fx/ Thanks for the heads-up. That's v1.05, the Jan 14, 2006 edition? Which program was updated to fix the phase-noise problem? The pn program's source code says 13-Jul-05, although the pn.cpp file date is 12-Feb-06. The broken version was 1.05, but I "slipstreamed" the fix into the same release without updating the version stamp. I really should've bumped the version number when I posted the fix, but it'll be pretty obvious if your copy has the bug. It will appear to work, but it will always start the PN sweep at 0 Hz rather than the minimum offset you specify. That makes the sweep take much longer than necessary, and the trace information at offsets below 10x the analyzer's minimum RBW is meaningless. Basically, if you downloaded it around the time I posted all those auctions, you probably got the bad version. I like the part where you get the "number of 1000-ns intervals since 1-Jan-1601 UTC" :-) Heh... I've wondered where Microsoft came up with that; it might have come from the Unix world. There's a lot of weirdness in the calendar business, and it's usually less arbitrary, but more obscure, than it seems at first. -- john, KE5FX |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Winfield Hill wrote:
http://www.qsl.net/ke5fx/ Thanks for the heads-up. That's v1.05, the Jan 14, 2006 edition? Which program was updated to fix the phase-noise problem? The pn program's source code says 13-Jul-05, although the pn.cpp file date is 12-Feb-06. The broken version was 1.05, but I "slipstreamed" the fix into the same release without updating the version stamp. I really should've bumped the version number when I posted the fix, but it'll be pretty obvious if your copy has the bug. It will appear to work, but it will always start the PN sweep at 0 Hz rather than the minimum offset you specify. That makes the sweep take much longer than necessary, and the trace information at offsets below 10x the analyzer's minimum RBW is meaningless. Basically, if you downloaded it around the time I posted all those auctions, you probably got the bad version. I like the part where you get the "number of 1000-ns intervals since 1-Jan-1601 UTC" :-) Heh... I've wondered where Microsoft came up with that; it might have come from the Unix world. There's a lot of weirdness in the calendar business, and it's usually less arbitrary, but more obscure, than it seems at first. -- john, KE5FX |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #726 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #719 | General | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Equipment | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Equipment | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Equipment |