Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wes Stewart wrote:
the minute you say "SO-239", all bets are off. I did some SPICE modelling of an ideal bridge (with resistive detector) and came to the same conclusions....that the higher-than-50 ohm-impedance UHF connector and adapter may be a limiting factor in the performance on a good SMA- or N- connectored load. It has virtually no effect on the difference in level between open and short terminations though. I have a link to a must read paper at: http://www.k6mhe.com/n7ws/ Note No. 11. Make particular note of the part, "The Curse of Adapters." Thanks...the original Wiltron app note has been a favourite of mine for many years, but have never seen the updated version. 73, Steve VE3SMA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
HP 5061-1136 Return Loss Bridge ? | Antenna | |||
Comet B-10 VHF Antenna Question | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
The two sorts of loss | Antenna |