| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wes Stewart wrote:
the minute you say "SO-239", all bets are off. I did some SPICE modelling of an ideal bridge (with resistive detector) and came to the same conclusions....that the higher-than-50 ohm-impedance UHF connector and adapter may be a limiting factor in the performance on a good SMA- or N- connectored load. It has virtually no effect on the difference in level between open and short terminations though. I have a link to a must read paper at: http://www.k6mhe.com/n7ws/ Note No. 11. Make particular note of the part, "The Curse of Adapters." Thanks...the original Wiltron app note has been a favourite of mine for many years, but have never seen the updated version. 73, Steve VE3SMA |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| HP 5061-1136 Return Loss Bridge ? | Antenna | |||
| Comet B-10 VHF Antenna Question | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| The two sorts of loss | Antenna | |||