Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() He is not calculating PEP properly. For 100% modulation the plate voltage must double. That will require 187 watts average power to do so. A little more with transformer losses. Average power output from the transmitter will be 375 watts carrier and 93 watts in each side band for a total of 562 watts average output with full modulation. But Peak envelope power will be 1500 watts at 100% modulation. 4 times carrier power. 100% modulation requires the plate voltage to double. Doubling the plate voltage also doubles the current. So twice the voltage and twice the current equals 4 times the power for PEP = 1500 watts. 4-125's in AB1 don't produce much power. I would have to look it up but their AB1 rating is very low compared to some other tube types. 73 Gary K4FMX On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 02:58:08 GMT, "Mont" wrote: Following is a note I received from a friend who earnestly believes that a Class C plate modulated final requires approximately 200% (rather than 50%) of the final power input to achieve 100% modulation. I am interested in any theoretical arguments surrounding this. Thanks, Mont - K0YCN ------------------------------------------- Mont, Here are the numbers as I calculate them to achieve my goal. Since Eimac specs are listed in terms of watts output so I will follow that too. My goal is to be capable of 130% positive peak modulation with 375 watts of carrier output. The Eimac tube manual says a single 4-400 typical operation at 3000 volts on the plate is 630 watts high level plate modulated carrier output. So, 630 watts X 4 = 2520 watts pep capability. So, a more conservative 375 watts X 4 X 1.30 = 1950 watts pos. peak. Dividing that by 2 = 975 watts of peak audio output required from the positive producing modulator tube to make 1950 pos. peak RF output. The 4-125 typical operation indicates 330 watts of AB1 is available. This is a far cry from 975 that I need. On the other hand a 4-400 in AB1 will deliver 1540 watts. The negative vs. positive peaks will be controlled by a broadcast quality Innovonics AM asymmetrical compressor limiter which I am currently using in the shack. The simple unexplained rule of thumb I came to understand early in my early ham days is that a 375 watt transmitter requires 187.5 watts of audio for 100% modulation. So, a 4-125, with 330 watts of capability, should be more than what is needed. In practical terms this is very misleading. That is why I been beating a dead horse for three years while two broadcast engineers could not explain why I could barely attain near 100 modulation. Little did I know that I was driving the pants of the poor 4-125's while trying! Hence, I ordered a custom built filament xfmr that will power two 4-400 modulators. Hope to have all that working in about two weeks. 73, |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How many licenses should there be, why and what privileges? | Policy | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
Newbie Question - Class C Amplifiers | Homebrew | |||
Newbie Question - Class C Amplifiers | Homebrew |