LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old April 25th 06, 09:46 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Steve N.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Class C engineering question

A couple of comments not covered by others.... *****

"Mont" wrote in message
. net...
Following is a note I received from a friend who earnestly believes that a
Class C plate modulated final requires approximately 200% (rather than

50%)
of the final power input to achieve 100% modulation. ... Thanks, Mont -

K0YCN
-------------------------------------------
Mont,

....
My goal is to be capable of 130% positive peak modulation with 375 watts

of
carrier output.


****** WHY?. What could be the possible benefit (thinking on terms of dB)?
This is what, 2 dB more power in the sidebands...? This is 69% more power
in the sidebands and 2dB is 56% more...


The Eimac 4-400...3000 volts...630 watts high level plate modulated

carrier output. So, 630 watts X 4 = 2520 watts pep capability.

***** PEP is a red herring here. I could be wrong because of the contorted
reasoning, but I believe he is confusing Peak power and PEP, but I can't be
sure 'cuz I don't completely understand what he is trying to reason out.
Peak Power is Vpk x Ipk
PEP is V(rms at the peak) x I(rms at the peak)


...375 watts X 4 X 1.30 = 1950 watts pos. peak.
Dividing that by 2 = 975 watts of peak audio output required...


**** This appears to be a location for a logic fault.


The 4-125 typical operation indicates 330 watts of AB1 is available....

*** Noted for later.


The negative vs. positive peaks will be controlled by a broadcast quality
Innovonics AM asymmetrical compressor limiter which I am currently using

in
the shack.


*** This may be a separate issue, but doesn't this suggest that the
modulator AND transformer must have the capability of handling the distorted
waveform from this "asymmetrical compressor " such that the low frequency
response extends low enough to get this extra plate voltage turing the
positive peaks?



... a 375 watt transmitter requires 187.5 watts of audio for
100% modulation. So, a 4-125, with 330 watts of capability, should be

more
than what is needed.


*** No argument here...

In practical terms this is very misleading.

*** paraphrased = " _I_ can't get _my_ circuit to work."


That is
why I been beating a dead horse for three years while two broadcast
engineers could not explain why I could barely attain near 100 modulation.
Little did I know that I was driving the pants of the poor 4-125's while
trying!


*** Are the RF amp and modulator operating properly in the first place?
*** Does he have the proper modulation transformer?
*** Is he even using a modulation transformer?
*** Is he confused between Peak power and PEP?

73, Steve, K9DCI

Hence, I ordered a custom built filament xfmr that will power two 4-400
modulators. Hope to have all that working in about two weeks.

73,




 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How many licenses should there be, why and what privileges? Bill Sohl Policy 113 January 8th 06 09:42 PM
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? Bill Sohl Policy 254 December 31st 05 03:50 AM
New ARRL Proposal N2EY Policy 331 March 4th 04 12:02 AM
Newbie Question - Class C Amplifiers Bruce Raymond Homebrew 20 August 30th 03 05:41 AM
Newbie Question - Class C Amplifiers Bruce Raymond Homebrew 0 August 29th 03 01:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017