Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K7ITM wrote:
Low level modulation is a huge waste of RF power?? Hey, _AM_ is a huge waste of RF power, and of spectrum to boot! Except with unusual modulating waveforms, 2/3 of the power is in a useless carrier. Now, compared with plate modulation of the PA, low level AM modulation followed by a linear amp may be somewhat less efficient (though a waste of DC power, not RF power), but remember, the modulator, presumably being a linear audio amplifier, isn't all that efficient either. In addition, there ARE ways to generate AM with low level modulation and efficient RF amplification--they have been used in AM broadcast transmitters. For the cost of a good high-level modulator, how many kilowatt-hours can you buy? Cheers, Tom The only modulation method that I've ever found to be of any real efficiency in generating AM is "outphasing" or "ampliphase". You can use the /most/ effective PA designs - optimised FET-based Class E stages can be over 90% efficient! This approach completely obviates all the problems with modulation transformers or big chokes. Haven't tried it with valves ("tubes" - US) - perhaps that should be a future project. Bob -- Everything gets easier with practice, except getting up in the morning! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Info needed on "Taylor Modulation" from the 50's. | Boatanchors | |||
Power Inductor Optimization... | Homebrew | |||
Power Inductor Optimization... | Homebrew | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna | |||
NCI Position for Rulemaking | Policy |