| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gary Schafer wrote:
Cathode modulation is very similar to grid modulation in performance. After all audio is placed between the grid and cathode just the same as it is with conventional grid modulation. The amount of cathode to plate modulation is minimal. Correct, and the distortion can be pretty nasty, too. Screen modulation is similar in performance to grid modulation also. Efficiency is around 35% carrier efficiency. Very tricky to tune up properly. It was the /only/ type of AM I used at first, as I was unable to get big mod transformers. It worked well enough, though it was difficult to get close to 100% mod. Lots of envelope feedback cured the non-linearity distortions. Low level modulation with a linear amplifier behind the modulated driver also has an efficiency of around 35%. Excellent AM can be generated this way as is done with some SSB transmitters in the AM mode. If properly set up one can not tell the difference between it and a high level plate modulated transmitter except that the plate modulated transmitter will probably have higher distortion. Low-level mod with a linear is very inefficient (with respect to DC input), but is sometimes the only really practical way to proceed. Again, lots of envelope feedback can sort out the distortions caused by less than perfect PAs! Bob -- Everything gets easier with practice, except getting up in the morning! |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Info needed on "Taylor Modulation" from the 50's. | Boatanchors | |||
| Power Inductor Optimization... | Homebrew | |||
| Power Inductor Optimization... | Homebrew | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna | |||
| NCI Position for Rulemaking | Policy | |||