Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was rummaging around for a core for a small switching power supply
and came across some 1.00" OD, 0.55" ID, 0.39" high (25x14x10 mm) toroids. A 50 turn coil measures about 1 mH (by measuring resonance at 200-500 kHz). This appears to indicate a permeability around 600, by comparing it with various catalogues. But the Q is rather low (equivalent series resistance is roughly 250 ohms at 500 kHz and 120 ohms at 200 kHz). Doesn't look likely to be good enough for a switching supply, so they may have to be relegated to EMI jobs (which I seem to recall they were used for in a piece of equipment I took apart). But does anyone have any idea what material they might be ? Doesn't at first glance appear to be anything similar to what Fair-Rite makes. There's a good chance it is of Asian origin, I think. 73, Steve VE3SMA |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Peake wrote:
Steve, the usual reason for the apparent low Q is that it is not being measured at the frequency that will give highest Q. Try fewer turns and higher frequencies as a first attempt. I've measured many cores this way. If you like, I can email you an XL spreadsheet with the all the cores I've measured so far. Switchmode cores seems to have permeabilities quite a bit higher than 600. Alan VK2ADB Alan, are the ferrite toroids used to filter the output of pc power supplies or the ac input of microwave ovens useful for other applications? Or is the ferrite material lossy like the small ferrite beads used for emi reduction on wires? Regards, Mike Monett |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Alan, are the ferrite toroids used to filter the output of pc power supplies or the ac input of microwave ovens useful for other applications? The PC PSU filter toroids seem to be optimized for the 25KHz -85KHz range so any applications you have for this frequency range could use them. Similarly, the AC input to the oven is probably 50/60HZ so those toroids would be better at the lower audio frequencies. Or is the ferrite material lossy like the small ferrite beads used for emi reduction on wires? Not quite sure about beads - ordinary ferrite material has fairly constant permeability up to a frequency determined by the ferrite mix, then drops off. Beads tend to have an impedance peak at some desired frequency range - e.g. 100-200MHz Alan |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Peake wrote:
The PC PSU filter toroids seem to be optimized for the 25KHz -85KHz range so any applications you have for this frequency range could use them. Similarly, the AC input to the oven is probably 50/60HZ so those toroids would be better at the lower audio frequencies. Not quite sure about beads - ordinary ferrite material has fairly constant permeability up to a frequency determined by the ferrite mix, then drops off. Beads tend to have an impedance peak at some desired frequency range - e.g. 100-200MHz Alan Thanks very much - that encourages me to try them and see how well they perform. Regards, Mike Monett |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ferrites have as many vices as they have virtues.
Ferrite salesmen cleverly make virtues out of vices. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
By the way, I found another surplus toroid with somewhat better
characteristics....higher permeability and higher Q, as measured around 200 kHz. That has now been incorporated in a small switching power supply operating at about 30 kHz. It works, though not as well as is predicted by a SPICE model. Must be some of those vices that Reg mentions ! My SPICE model does not take into account the variation of the permeability/inductance with DC current, so this may be at least part of the difference. One of these years I'll break down and get an oscilloscope so I can figure out what non-microwave circuits are really doing, and maybe a signal generator that works below 150 kHz. It is adequate (barely) for what I need, however, so it has now been incorporated as a bias supply in my 3.4 GHz transverter. I'm crossing my fingers that it keeps working over the temperature range it will encounter in portable operation. The Q-measurement technique I have been using involves connecting a signal generator through a 50 ohm attenuator (to set the output impedance) to a 50-ohm input microwattmeter. The inductor and a capacitor are connected as a series-tuned resonant circuit and inserted either in series between the pad and the meter or shunted across the meter input. The inductance is obtained by finding the resonant frequency and working backward through the formula, given the known capacitance. The tuned circuit is then replaced with a resistor which is adjusted (by substitution) to give the same power on the meter as the tuned circuit at resonance. This resistance is equal to the equivalent series resistance of the tuned circuit, from which the Q can be determined. As yet the Q results I obtain with the series and shunt connections tend to be somewhat different, so my techniques certainly have room for improvement (there are quite obvious stray-coupling issues, even at LF), but it gives me a rough idea, anyway. 73, Steve VE3SMA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Here's Your Answer, Todd.... | Policy | |||
WTB Really Skinny Whip Material for 1/4 wave two meter | Antenna | |||
Toroid! Toroid! Toroid! | Antenna | |||
Question about toroid vs. air core coil. | Homebrew | |||
Roger Wiseman material | Policy |