Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"AndyS" wrote in message
oups.com... The radiating element, which you are measuring, has to have a counterpoise (ground) to establish the Efield against and an Hfield around. I believe that -- at least from a mathematical perspective -- "infinity" is a perfectly good counterpoise. (Just as isolated conductors have capacitance to infinity and inductors have "partial inductance" whereby a return path at infinity is assumed.) As a practical matter, of course the user's hands and other objects in the environment will affect the measurement, but suggesting that "one must always have a well-defined counterpoise" would tend to discourage one from studying antennas that are less sensitive to counterpoises than those that are, and this endeavor is quite valuable for the design of miniature antennas. After all, there are millions of commercial devices in operation every day for which the counterpoise is ill-defined. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question is 'it' a Longwire {Random Wire} Antenna -or- Inverted "L" Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
Two Shortwave Listener (SWL) 10:1 Baluns for Random Wire Antennas | Swap | |||
RF filters and Impedance Matching | Homebrew | |||
Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave | |||
Balun | Shortwave |