Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 12:53?pm, wrote:
On Mar 4, 12:48?pm, Mike Coslo wrote: Some may tell you that all it takes to tune up a tube transmitter is to "peak the grid and dip the plate", but that's simply not correct. Tuneup procedures vary according to rig design and you have to be specific. Sorry, but that was procedure for pre-WW2 high- power HF transmitters. While it is a simplistic phrase, it still applies. A more exact procedure was to tune up the exciter with reduced drive power and literally peak the grid current. Plate current was then observed with the plate tuning adjusted for a slight, but observable dip in plate current. Of (perhaps) greater importance was setting the neutralizing control for minimum grid current; "dipping" the plate current should produce the least grid current peak on adjusting the plate tuning. For best results on setting the load-side capacitor of the common pi-network without a bidirectional power meter, a detector way out in the field with meter next to the transmitter is the simplest way to "tune" that capacitor. However, with about 34+ other high-power transmitters all in the antenna field, that is impractical; presets for that control would suffice. The load capacitor of a pi-net has the least effect on tuning to a new frequency. When someone does about two QSYs per shift on at least 15 different transmitters with pi-network output circuits (all with vacuum tube PAs), yes, one "gets used to it" but what I described was the correct phrase. The pi-network has been around and used in HF transmitters since at least the late 1930s and has survived past the start of the semiconductor era. However, the convenience of broadband transistor power amplifiers has pretty much tossed that whole tube tuning procedure. Used with a Bruene detector sensor for an automatic antenna tuner, it makes QSYing a snap, even jumping bands (with a broad- band antenna, of course). "Peak the grid and dip the plate" is an old correct phrase. It will be found mentioned in the current US amateur radio question pools. Yes, there are exceptions. I was once involved with a distributed amplifier design that would cover over an octave of spectrum using tubes and was NOT tuned at all in normal operation. Since that one involved over a dozen vacuum tubes (ceramic-metal medium-power types), it would not be suitable for ordinary amateur radio HF transmitter stations. The vertical amplifier of the old Tektronix 54n series oscilloscopes used push-pull tube-type (all glass envelope "receiving" type) distributed vertical deflection amplifier. The pi-network output circuit was a favorite among amateur homebrewers for decades due to its simplicity and better ability to attenuate harmonics, that coming to be more and more prominent in regulations as HF users became more plentiful. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|