Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:15:40 EDT, "Ivor Jones"
wrote: If I put up a 70 foot tower (the maximum level below which local authorities cannot regulate in Oregon) it and I will certainly become known to my neighbors!! 70ft and they can't regulate..?! Wow, things are certainly different your side of the water..! Here in the UK it varies depending on where in the country you are, As it does here. The Federal requirement is "reasonable accommodation by the least restrictive means" for heights suitable to conduct the desired communication. In addition to the Federal standard, the various states have also enacted nearly-identical statutes (local authorities and courts are much more comfortable dealing with state or local requirements as compared to the exact same thing imposed by the "Great White Father in Washington"! g Oregon is only one of two (I believe) states whose statutes specify a height up to which "reasonable accommodation" is presumed by operation of law. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane ARRL Volunteer Counsel email: k2asp [at] arrl [dot] net |