Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 26th 07, 07:48 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 15
Default How Many Of Us Are Hams & OTR Lovers

Hi everyone:

The reason I ask this question is because I'd like to build a concensus as
to how many of us in the OTR (Old Time Radio) community are Hams.
Conversely, I'd like to build a consensus as to how many of us in the Ham
community are lovers of OTR shows.

The reason behind this is simple. I'd like to consider starting up a
loosely-formal net on EchoLink that's devoted to OTR. The premise would be
anything related to OTR or radio in general.

As for what would be allowed for non-Ham participation, we could set up a
live audio stream (I can do this with no problem) so that people can at
least LISTEN to the net, though what I'd like to see happen is the
possibility of using Skype as a virtual "phone patch" as it were (There
shouldn't be a problem with Third Party traffic rules as far as I can see if
they're properly followed).

Problem with this though is whether the EchoLink admins. would consider such
an integration to be an acceptable use of the system or not (My bet is that
it probably would not). But I'll ask anyway.

I'll also ask this of the EchoLink group as well, but I'd like to hear your
thoughts.

Cheers & 73 to all the Hams in the community

Pat Cook, KB0OXD
Denver, Colorado
Jeeper One Media - http://www.freewebtown.com/jeeperone/
KB0OXD Cybershack - http://www.qsl.net/kb0oxd/
EchoLink Node No. 19905


  #2   Report Post  
Old April 27th 07, 01:48 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 55
Default How Many Of Us Are Hams & OTR Lovers

On Apr 26, 6:48 pm, "Pat Cook" wrote:


.... what I'd like to see happen is the
possibility of using Skype as a virtual "phone patch" as it were (There
shouldn't be a problem with Third Party traffic rules as far as I can see if
they're properly followed).


This would be the equivalent of a virtual "reverse autopatch without a
control operator" and not legal under the current rules.

73, de Hans, K0HB



  #3   Report Post  
Old April 27th 07, 04:23 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 7
Default How Many Of Us Are Hams & OTR Lovers


Go to http://www.sarsradio.com and put this out to the members there.
Lots of hams are members as well.

http://www.sarsradio.com/

  #4   Report Post  
Old April 27th 07, 06:09 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 55
Default How Many Of Us Are Hams & OTR Lovers

On Apr 27, 3:21 am, "Pat Cook" wrote:


Ahh....But suppose the Ham was the one who initiated the contact? That
wouldn't be a virtual reverse autopatch. It'd probably be considered the
same as a traditional phone patch akin to what many HF operators use.


It doesn't seem analogous to me, so let me construct a model, so that
I can ask questions about that model.

In a traditional HF phone patch there are two licensed ham stations
involved. Station K1AAA calls station K0BBB in Denver and says
"Please patch me to my girlfriend. Her number is 303-555-1212."

K0BBB now dials up the g/f, connects her to his rig, and controls his
transmitter allowing her to talk (or not talk).

Where in Echolink is the equivalent of K0BBB controlling his
transmitter allowing the third party to speak, or more importantly,
cutting off the third party if they seem to be violating a rule?

73, de Hans, K0HB




  #5   Report Post  
Old April 27th 07, 06:28 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 15
Default How Many Of Us Are Hams & OTR Lovers

Hi everyone:

wrote in message
. ..

Go to http://www.sarsradio.com and put this out to the members there. Lots
of hams are members as well.


Thanks.

Things are FAR from finalized though (The EchoLink crowd still has yet to
weigh in last time I checked), but this will help.

Cheers & 73

Pat




  #6   Report Post  
Old April 27th 07, 09:38 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 229
Default How Many Of Us Are Hams & OTR Lovers

"Pat Cook" wrote on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:48:27
EDT

Hi everyone:

The reason I ask this question is because I'd like to build a concensus as
to how many of us in the OTR (Old Time Radio) community are Hams.
Conversely, I'd like to build a consensus as to how many of us in the Ham
community are lovers of OTR shows.


Well, I think that's nice but it isn't my cuppa. Being older than the
FCC and
having grown up with nothing but radio broadcasting and 78 RPM disc
recordings for electronic entertainment, that OTR program stuff was
just there,
nothing else to compare it to. :-) Thanks anyway.

73, Len AF6AY

  #7   Report Post  
Old April 29th 07, 03:24 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
Default How Many Of Us Are Hams & OTR Lovers

Read your FCC Rules and Regs and you will see that any broadcast of
OTR is illegal over Echolink. Sad to say it is just not the right
forum. Best to stick with the regular internet. We're just not
allowed to broadcast anything at all.

Marsha N8FE (ham who loves OTR)



On Apr 26, 2:48 pm, "Pat Cook" wrote:
The reason behind this is simple. I'd like to consider starting up a
loosely-formal net on EchoLink that's devoted to OTR. The premise would be
anything related to OTR or radio in general.

Pat Cook, KB0OXD



  #8   Report Post  
Old April 29th 07, 05:16 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 618
Default How Many Of Us Are Hams & OTR Lovers

Hi Marsha,

I don't think they are talking about broadcasting OTR. They are talking
about a net to discuss things related to OTR. Such a discussion net would
be fine.

Dee, N8UZE


"craftygal7388" wrote in message
oups.com...
Read your FCC Rules and Regs and you will see that any broadcast of
OTR is illegal over Echolink. Sad to say it is just not the right
forum. Best to stick with the regular internet. We're just not
allowed to broadcast anything at all.

Marsha N8FE (ham who loves OTR)



On Apr 26, 2:48 pm, "Pat Cook" wrote:
The reason behind this is simple. I'd like to consider starting up a
loosely-formal net on EchoLink that's devoted to OTR. The premise would
be
anything related to OTR or radio in general.

Pat Cook, KB0OXD





  #9   Report Post  
Old April 30th 07, 03:40 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 15
Default How Many Of Us Are Hams & OTR Lovers

Hi everyone:

"Dee Flint" wrote in message
. ..
Hi Marsha,

I don't think they are talking about broadcasting OTR. They are talking
about a net to discuss things related to OTR. Such a discussion net would
be fine.


Exactly Dee.

Think of it like you would a topical net on HF such as Handi-Hams, QRP or
some other niche topic.

Cheers & 73

Pat Cook, KB0OXD
Denver, Colorado
WEBSITE - http://www.qsl.net/kb0oxd/
**NEW VIDEO SECTION - http://www.qsl.net/kb0oxd/cybershacktv/


  #10   Report Post  
Old April 30th 07, 06:50 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
Default How Many Of Us Are Hams & OTR Lovers

Hi Dee ,

That's a horse of a different color as one of my favorite movies
goes... sounds like a nice idea. But I agree that you must have 2
licensed control ops at all times as Hans pointed out. Sounds like you
have some more investigating to do. Be interesting to see what you
come up with.

Vy 73,

Marsha N8FE


On Apr 29, 10:40 pm, "Pat Cook" wrote:
Hi everyone:

"Dee Flint" wrote in message
I don't think they are talking about broadcasting OTR. They are talking
about a net to discuss things related to OTR. Such a discussion net would be fine.


Exactly Dee.
Think of it like you would a topical net on HF such as Handi-Hams, QRP or some other niche topic.

Cheers & 73

Pat Cook, KB0OXD
Denver, Colorado
WEBSITE -http://www.qsl.net/kb0oxd/
**NEW VIDEO SECTION -http://www.qsl.net/kb0oxd/cybershacktv/



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are Larbgai and CheesyBob lovers? joemomma Shortwave 1 January 20th 11 03:19 PM
For all the 'Royals' lovers here... m II Shortwave 4 April 27th 05 11:58 AM
For all PCR1000 & PCR100 lovers out there... JJ Shortwave 1 September 6th 04 06:13 PM
For magnet lovers... Greysky Homebrew 34 June 27th 04 10:15 PM
BBC - Gays who EAT their "lovers" Cindy-Lu Who Shortwave 1 November 24th 03 09:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017