"Michael Coslo" wrote in message
...


If enough people are as "alienated" as he says, it should be possible
to
compete however, and build a new alternative to ARRL membership. I've
given
enough reasons that I don't think it will work, but I don't mind being
proven
wrong.


I've read that paragraph several times, and it remains
self-contradictory.

(A) "it should be possible", but (B) you've "given enough reasons that I
don't think it will work". So which of those won't you "mind being
proven wrong", A or B?



My message is pretty simple. Take away all the "sophistry" and it is:

- "If you don't like what is happening, get involved. Change it."


That's Paul's clear message. But yours is wrapped in condescending
patronization.

The Man in the Maze
QRO from Baboquivari Peak, AZ

--
Iitoi






--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---