Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
AF6AY wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote on Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:36:39 EST: When a member noted that the ARS frequencies were there for use after the normal comms weren't working, he replied " Every thing we do is a matter of life and death, so we can use your frequencies any way we wish". That was not only wrong, but scary that people that think in that manner are coming into the hobby with such an attitude. That person was more right than wrong. If one bothers to look, the small-number Parts of Title 47 C.F.R. state clearly that ANYONE can use ANY radio frequency to call for assistance if a situation is really life or death...licensed or not. True. Phil Kane could probably quote the Part and wording off the top of his head but, not being an attorney, I would have to search the Parts (all freely accessible). Besides, someone in here would want to start a whole steamy argument thread on that, arguing minutiae on the whichness of the what...:-) Memory says it is the Part on commercial radio licenses but undoubtedly someone in here will say 'I am wrong.' [sigh] It is not as simple as that. What constitutes an emergency? If an ambulance crew is transporting a 90 year old heart attack victim, it is certainly a matter of life or death for that one patient. However, if the ambulance breaks down, they can't commandeer your car. For a government agency to seize private property (a category that includes repeaters, transceivers, etc.) for their own use, they must have a declaration of emergency, declaration of martial law, or, in individual cases, a court order. The fire department employee who claimed that the FD could take over an amateur radio club's repeaters anytime that they wanted to do so was dead wrong. -- Klystron |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 29, 10:20 am, Klystron wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote on Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:36:39 EST: When a member noted that the ARS frequencies were there for use after the normal comms weren't working, he replied " Every thing we do is a matter of life and death, so we can use your frequencies any way we wish". It is not as simple as that. What constitutes an emergency? "Imminent danger of loss of life, serious injury, or damage/loss of property". Or verbiage something like that. If an ambulance crew is transporting a 90 year old heart attack victim, it is certainly a matter of life or death for that one patient. Agreed. But what if they are transporting several people - say, a young family that was in a serious auto accident? Or suppose they were transporting desperately-needed medicines, blood, etc., during an epidemic? However, if the ambulance breaks down, they can't commandeer your car. For a government agency to seize private property (a category that includes repeaters, transceivers, etc.) for their own use, they must have a declaration of emergency, declaration of martial law, or, in individual cases, a court order. I'm not sure what the ultimate legality is, in a case like that or the others I described. I suspect that government folks would not seize private property for emergency use unless they were desperate, because of the possible liability. OTOH, would you want to have it on your conscience that a person or a family died because you wouldn't let the ambulance folks use your car when it was desperately needed? The fire department employee who claimed that the FD could take over an amateur radio club's repeaters anytime that they wanted to do so was dead wrong. I don't think the FD person wanted the repeaters. He said they could use the frequencies, not the repeaters. And the frequencies are public property, after all. An amateur or club might own the repeater but they don't own the frequencies. Further complicating the situation is the fact that many if not most amateur radio repeaters aren't installed on the owner's property. For example, one of the repeaters I use is on top of a local hospital, where its antenna shares rooftop space with antennas for other radio services. (It's an excellent location and gives very good coverage). It's connected to the hospital's backup power system, too. The repeater club pays a nominal fee for the electric power and rent. Given that level of community support, don't the repeater owners have some responsibility to the community? Like the situation of the broken-down ambulance, would any radio amateur want it on his/her conscience that a building burned down, and/ or people died, because s/he wouldn't let the emergency service people use an amateur radio repeater in an emergency when it was desperately needed? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Klystron wrote: AF6AY wrote: Michael Coslo wrote on Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:36:39 EST: When a member noted that the ARS frequencies were there for use after the normal comms weren't working, he replied " Every thing we do is a matter of life and death, so we can use your frequencies any way we wish". That was not only wrong, but scary that people that think in that manner are coming into the hobby with such an attitude. That person was more right than wrong. If one bothers to look, the small-number Parts of Title 47 C.F.R. state clearly that ANYONE can use ANY radio frequency to call for assistance if a situation is really life or death...licensed or not. True. Phil Kane could probably quote the Part and wording off the top of his head but, not being an attorney, I would have to search the Parts (all freely accessible). Besides, someone in here would want to start a whole steamy argument thread on that, arguing minutiae on the whichness of the what...:-) Memory says it is the Part on commercial radio licenses but undoubtedly someone in here will say 'I am wrong.' [sigh] It is not as simple as that. What constitutes an emergency? If an ambulance crew is transporting a 90 year old heart attack victim, it is certainly a matter of life or death for that one patient. However, if the ambulance breaks down, they can't commandeer your car. For a government agency to seize private property (a category that includes repeaters, transceivers, etc.) for their own use, they must have a declaration of emergency, declaration of martial law, or, in individual cases, a court order. The fire department employee who claimed that the FD could take over an amateur radio club's repeaters anytime that they wanted to do so was dead wrong. Well actually AF6AY, and Mike are reading more into those passages of Title 47 than they were, and are, intended, by the Commission. Phil, being an ex FCC Lawyer can expound on the intent, but when I was a Resident Field Agent, it was understood within the Commission, that Amateurs, operating within their Licenses, are NOT restricted to Frequencies, modes, or just about any other restriction, of operation, during Safety of Life situations, that are authorized by the PART 97, but this does NOT Allow them to use Frequencies NOT Authorized under than Part. The same is true for Licensees operating under other Parts like 90, 87, and 80, where that Specific Language is used in the Part. The fact of the matter is, that you only get in trouble, IF someone complains, or has a problem with your operation, and is willing to go on the Record with their objection with your operation, and Force an investigation, of the incident. Sometimes Common Sense does prevail, but sometimes it turns into a very BIG Deal. Case in Point, a few years back, there was an incident in California, where a young fellow used his Mod'ed HT to beak into the Local Sheriff's Frequency to report an injured Hiker. The Sheriff took offense to that intrusion, and there was a GIANT BrewHAHA, that as I recall, Phil was involved in. We had quite a discussion about the situation, between ourselves about the incident, and again, as I recall the issue was settled out of HQ by some of the BIG GUN Lawyers back there. -- Bruce in alaska add path after fast to reply |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:20:00 EST, Klystron wrote:
It is not as simple as that. What constitutes an emergency? Gee, let's open that can of worms once again! It's a two-prong test - it has to be a situation involving immediate safety of life or property, AND no other means of communication are available. My job at the Commish' involved reviewing such cases before Violation Notices were sent out, and in the vast majority of cases, both prongs were not met. In fact, in one notable case, the radio tech of the law enforcement agency upon whose frequency the "wanna-be" came up took the transceiver that was used to the location and was able to bring up several repeaters with "9-1-1" autopatch capability. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon e-mail: k2asp [at] arrl [dot] net |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
AF6AY wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote on Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:36:39 EST: AF6AY wrote: Michael Coslo wrote on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:00:40 EST: Do we HAVE to 'attract new blood?' Serious question. We do need new people to replace those who leave for one reason or the other. I want someone to talk to on the other end, and don't want the Amateur radio community to become closed and eventually die out. That seems a tad premature to me. At present there are 722K TOTAL licensees and the expiration rate is roughly 27K/year. If that keeps up without any newcomers, it would be 26.7 years before all were gone. [of course there will be newcomers...but how many depends on the attitude of the old-timers they come in contact with] ... We are NOT required to DO certain things in the hobby just because some old-timers say we MUST do those besides the regulations that all must obey. I'm fortunate that I never had that experience. Of course, if someone ever did tell me how I was supposed to use my time in the hobby, I think I would politely decline, and go do what I wanted to do. 8^) Well, from my experience (at work or at play) I've had some who INSISTED on telling me what I 'should' be doing. Some of those got rather antagonistic about it. "We don't DO that kind of thing in fill-in-the-blank" kind of comment. It was so prevalent among amateur radio licensees that I encountered that it turned me off of bothering to get a license for a long time. That's been my experience over the last half century and I spent that time working IN the electronics industry. I'll have to say that the above attitude was reflected in the older amateur-radio-interest newsgroups and was partly due to the creation of rec.radio.amateur.moderated. ... I don't know if you were watching the group a few weeks ago, but I related a story about an emergency comm person speaking at a club meeting. I was 'reading the mail' but didn't bother with it much. :-) When a member noted that the ARS frequencies were there for use after the normal comms weren't working, he replied " Every thing we do is a matter of life and death, so we can use your frequencies any way we wish". That was not only wrong, but scary that people that think in that manner are coming into the hobby with such an attitude. That person was more right than wrong. If one bothers to look, the small-number Parts of Title 47 C.F.R. state clearly that ANYONE can use ANY radio frequency to call for assistance if a situation is really life or death...licensed or not. True. It has to be life and death, and keep in mind that Law enforcement is happy to make that determination after the fact - and has in some cases. The thing that had people concerned in this case was the "anything" message. some snippage Radio amateur licensees are not bound JUST to what Part 97 says. The whole of Title 47 applies, even if 99+% has nothing directly to do with the amateur radio service. But, with REAL life-and-death situations, anyone can use any frequency at any time with or without any license. He (and some like him) come in to talk to the people who will be building and maintaining repeaters and infrastructure, and lay one like that on them? Let's take that IN context. Consider that the attending radio amateurs might ALSO have an 'attitude' going. Consider that lots of government infrastructure radio facilities are kept going 24/7 expressly FOR the purpose of life-and-death comms needs. Amateur radio repeaters aren't. Amateur repeaters are there primarily for the benefit of other amateurs. One of the issues that has come up in the post Katrina world is that a number of public service agencies have had their employees get Ham radio licenses. All well and good, and probably an end run around getting hobbyists to help, since the employee hams will already be on the job. Problem is, the new hams in many cases are just looking for another communication channel, and are not interested in radio as radio. Even this is okay. But.. The problem that arises is that there is an expectation the people who are interested in the hobby and its technical issues are going to keep everything up and running. Even then, many of us with that ability are willing to pitch in. But the big question is who becomes liable if that repeater fails? I think that in many ways, Ham radio emergency operations are tending to become employees who also have a ham license. And their interests are more in the line of what they do best - save lives, not put up repeaters. - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kudos to those working to bring new folks, young and old, to ham
radio. Some observations from a ham who started out in ham radio at the age of 13 (in no particular order): 1) Don't just go for high schoolers. Middle-school and even elementary schoolers can be hams if they're interested enough. 3) Don't try to sell amateur radio as a substitute for cell phones, the internet, or other communications methods. Sell it as a unique activity with its own unique attractions and rewards. 4) Scouting has a long history of connection to amateur radio. Some councils have pretty serious amateur radio programs, and always need more help. 5) Don't assume what parts of amateur radio young people will or won't be interested in. Emphasize the wide variety of activities hams do, and how much choice there is. 6) Don't assume that younger hams only want to associate with other younger hams. For me, part of the attraction to amateur radio was the opportunity to be part of a community where one's age, gender, income, etc. are not a factor. Morse Code operation made this possible - on the air with that mode, nobody knows how old you are. You can interact with other hams of all ages. You're judged by your skills and signal quality, not how much you spent on your rig, etc. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What makes the toad a better person? | Policy | |||
For the person that asked.... | CB | |||
PeePeeHolic: How Can Any Person Be SO Gay | CB | |||
Will the person who I got the ham equipment from please contact me? | Swap |