Remember Me?
Menu
Home
Search
Today's Posts
Home
Search
Today's Posts
RadioBanter
»
rec.radio.amateur
»
Moderated
>
Something old and something new
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Prev
Next
#
11
July 13th 08, 09:00 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated
Steve Bonine
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 169
Something old and something new
wrote:
On Jul 12, 9:16am, Steve Bonine wrote:
Personally, I happen to be a purist; I'll use a logging program but I'm
not interested in using computer-generated CW or computer-
aided QSOs.
But most logging programs will also generate code.
But that doesn't mean that I have to avail myself of this function.
btw, Hams were
using CQ wheels in the 1920s....
Good point. But there's a progression from using a CQ wheel, thru
letting the keyer complete the contest QSO, to having a computer
automatically copy the exchange, log it, and send the response.
Somewhere in that progression my threshold for "doing it myself" is
passed. It's not really an objective thing . . . I am OK with a
programmable keyer that will send CQ, and I'll use a computer-based
logging program, but much past that and it changes the flavor of the
operation.
Every major contest I know of has some recognition of power level.
Field Day, which started this discussion, recognizes three power
levels:
QRP, which is 5 watts or less with non-generator-or-commercial-mains
power,
Low power, which is all stations who don't qualify for QRP and are
running 150 watts or less
High power, which is 150 watts to 1500 watts.
The idea is to recognize that more power changes the game
significantly. If there are power categories why not automation
categories?
Because power is objective -- you can easily measure it -- while
automation is much more complicated. There's not an "automation meter"
that you can read and say "I'm in category C."
I think that a recognition of automation is good, but I recognize that
the rules are likely to be complex. For example, if you establish a
"purist" category, where do you draw the line . . . keyer? memory
keyer? keyer that can generate sequence number? computer logging and
dupe checking? spotting? CW copying? CW generation?
It is, after all, a hobby. I'd hate for it to degenerate too much into
bean counting.
73, Steve KB9X
Reply With Quote
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
On
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
On
Pingbacks
are
On
Refbacks
are
On
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
04:35 PM
.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
Contact Us
RadioBanter forum home
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks