Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 31, 8:19 pm, wrote:
Over a number of years they succeeded in all but eliminating the concept of the skilled, knowledgeable, *licensed* Radio Operator. Saved lots of money and aggravation. All we have left now are pieces of the old rules and requirements. Some might say that the new technologies no longer required specialized Radio Operators, and in some cases that's probably true. But I think the dismantling of commercial Radio Operator licensing was more about the deregulation for the sake of bigger profits rather than the lack of need for operators. This part of the history touches upon a issue that I think fits under the "law of unintended consequenses." I came into Amateur radio as a digital guy who wanted to learn about radio This may give me a different perspective.. A lot of Hams, especially those who have been Hams for a long time, seem to inadvertently downplay just what knowledge is needed to be an effective communicator in wireless. You see this in their comments about some supposed ease in getting a license, among others. I'm here to tell you that the art and science of making a communications link between randomly "chosen" areas, and all the electronics that that entails, is a matter that takes some serious education and/or experience. Yet time after time, the systems that we come up with just fail. And the problem is always that the best laid plans to take the skilled operator out of the link fail. The reason is pretty simple. The effort to remove the decisions that an educated operator would make add infrastructure to the system. When the wheels com off, the infrastructure fails. The same forces that destroy, flood, and freeze the victims of disaster also have an effect on the infrastructure that is in place to rescue them. On the commercial radio operator demise part, I'd have to say that you want to listen in my area to hear the results. One company owns all the radio stations in my area, with the exception of the Public station.. The only one I bother to listen to other than the Public station is the local ESPN sports station. They regularly go off the air for long periods of time, play the satellite feed message, or my favorite, play two feeds at once. The funny thing is that the most listened to station in the area is guess who, the public station. They still have engineers, they still monitor their output, and they actually take input from their listeners. That deregulation, that getting rid of skilled employees, did it work when we have 8 or 9 stations that are horribly undependable, and most everyone, even people who hate to admit it, listen to the public radio station? - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dumbed down licensing. That's what you want. | General | |||
US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
Instant licensing? | Policy |