Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Discussion of US Amateur Radio license requirements elsewhere got me
thinking that a discussion of the whole subject might be interesting. For me, the place to start is the historical beginnings. The following is my take on events with respect to US Amateur Radio. Before 1912, there was very little regulation of radio by the US government. The whole technology was so new and revolutionary that it took a while for the need of regulation to become apparent. Various bills were introuced before Congress but not much changed until the Titanic disaster showed the need for better regulation in several areas. Since the main commercial use of radio at the time was for maritime communications, the effects of that tragedy were widespread. After 1912, the Federal government took a very active role in the regulation of radio. Their solution was licensing of both operators and of stations, regulations establishing different radio services and enforcing technical/operating standards, and the issuance of callsigns to positively identify transmitting starions. Those in charge knew, understood and supported the concept of the skilled, knowledgeable, licensed Radio Operator in all radio services. In some services the required skills and knowledge would be mostly technical, in others they would be mostly operational, and in most a mixture of operational and technical, but in all cases the licensed Radio Operator was indispensable. Thus there were Amateur licenses, Commercial Radiotelephone licenses and Commercial Radiotelegraph licenses. There were station licenses and operator licenses. There were several operator license classes, serious test requirements. As technology developed, and a whole flock of endorsements for things like radar were created. Some of this did not come easily. During the 1920s there was a considerable amount of debate over which government level and agency should regulate radio, and how new technologies such as broadcasting, which was unknown in 1912, should be handled. There was also the evolution of world radio treaties to set up standards betweennations. Through all this the concept of Amateur Radio evolved, in large part due to the efforts of those such as H.P. Maxim, Charles Stewart, K.B. Warner and many others, They faced considerable opposition, because there were many who would have liked Radio to be a strictly commercial or government technology. For example, the 1912 regulations limited amateurs to 1000 watts input and waves no longer than 200 meters, and required licensing of all transmitting stations and all operators. Many simply left the air because they felt the new rules were too restrictive, but others pressed on to see what could be done. One may wonder why the regulations didn't just outlaw amateur radio entirely. I think there were three reasons: First were the efforts of Maxim and the others, testifying before Congress and committees as to the need for Amateur Radio. Second was the general feeling during the Progressive Era that the average person should have at least some access to radio transmitting. Third was the widely-held idea that the low power of 1 kW and the short waves below 200 meters were essentially useless for commercial purposes, so why not banish the amateurs to them? A similar situation developed after WW1 ended, and again it took a considerable effort to get amateurs back on the air. One added factor in 1919 was that thousands of amateurs had proved the worth of their self-training in radio during the war. Efforts to secure the place of Amateur Radio in the regulations continued through the 1920s, culminating with the 1927 treaty regulations that recognized Amateur Radio as a separate and distinct radio service, with its own bands and rules guaranteed by treaty as well as national laws. Licensing of all radio transmitters and operators had some far- reaching effects. For example, licensing of commercial operators created not only a lot of jobs but a whole profession. Every radio service needed licensed Radio Operators of various levels for various tasks. Whether it was routine transmitter checks at a daytime-only AM BC station, running a vital maritime shore station, or any of dozens of other jobs, the licensed Radio Operator was an absolute necessity, by law. And these became pretty good jobs, with decent pay andbenefits. Someone could have a Ph.D. in EE, the Nobel Prize in physics, years of military radio experience, etc., etc., but without the proper License they were not a Radio Operator and could not legally do any of the Radio Operator's jobs. Amateur Radio was often the first step in the licensing process of commercial operators, though not all commercial operators started outas hams. The end result was that for several decades a commercial license of the right type, plus a high-school-equivalent education and a clean record, were practically a Golden Ticket to a decent-paying career. This doesn't mean all the jobs or the licenses were easy to do or get, nor that a Radio Operator didn't have to know his/her stuff. Just that it was a way for folks who knew something about Radio to get a decent living without a college degree and without low-priced competition, both domestic and "offshore". At the same time, none of the licenses, commercial or amateur, required anything close to the knowledge of an four-year EE degree. Nor were they meant to. Even the military followed suit. For example the US Navy had various classes of Radioman, each requiring a considerable amount of training, experience, and proof of skills and knowledge. Another result of all this licensing was that the government didn't really have to do all that much enforcement. Licensing produced a culture where respect for and compliance with the regulations was taken very seriously, and nobody, commercial or amateur, wanted to risk the loss of an operator or station license. They were too hard to get in the first place, and even more difficult to replace if revoked. It was a pretty good system - maybe too good. The problem was that the Captains of Industry didn't like paying for all those licensed Radio Operators, nor their benefits, for what seemed to them to be simple, easy jobs. Unionized or not, the License requirements meant the Captains couldn't hire just anybody for the jobs, nor could they combine certain jobs to reduce the head count, nor could they neglect doing certain things to reduce expenses. Nor could they export the work. So the Captains of Industry got the regulators, and the regulations,changed. Over a number of years they succeeded in all but eliminating the concept of the skilled, knowledgeable, *licensed* Radio Operator. Saved lots of money and aggravation. All we have left now are pieces of the old rules and requirements. Some might say that the new technologies no longer required specialized Radio Operators, and in some cases that's probably true. But I think the dismantling of commercial Radio Operator licensing was more about the deregulation for the sake of bigger profits rather than the lack of need for operators. And since they did it for commercial services, the same concepts were applied to the Amateur Radio Service. But the Amateur Radio Service is still all about the technically knowledgeable, operationally skilled Radio Operator. Or at least I think it should be. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dumbed down licensing. That's what you want. | General | |||
US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
Instant licensing? | Policy |