Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jerry Stuckle wrote: As for the mesh network between hospitals. You need to be careful. For instance, NO medical information can be transmitted in the clear (HIPAA regulations have severe penalties for doing so) - which eliminates ham radio for transmitting this information (encryption not allowed). Whoa, that is an ultra Broad Statement, and not supported by Part 97 Rules. There was published a very compelling White Paper on Part 97 Encryption Policy last Fall, that has generated some interest. I sent a copy to a few "Friends" at FCC HQ, from the Old Days, and got some very interesting replies, that though UnOfficial, tend to lead me to believe that the White Paper is Spot On.... Maybe Phil, could expound on the issue, a bit more as He was, is, a Comms Lawyer, previously with the Commission. What say Phil, would you like to climb out on this limb? -- Bruce in Alaska add path before the @ for email |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:52:20 EST, Bruce Gordon
wrote: Maybe Phil, could expound on the issue, a bit more as He was, is, a Comms Lawyer, previously with the Commission. What say Phil, would you like to climb out on this limb? Stand by on that..... 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/27/2013 1:52 PM, Bruce Gordon wrote:
In article , Jerry Stuckle wrote: As for the mesh network between hospitals. You need to be careful. For instance, NO medical information can be transmitted in the clear (HIPAA regulations have severe penalties for doing so) - which eliminates ham radio for transmitting this information (encryption not allowed). Whoa, that is an ultra Broad Statement, and not supported by Part 97 Rules. There was published a very compelling White Paper on Part 97 Encryption Policy last Fall, that has generated some interest. I sent a copy to a few "Friends" at FCC HQ, from the Old Days, and got some very interesting replies, that though UnOfficial, tend to lead me to believe that the White Paper is Spot On.... Maybe Phil, could expound on the issue, a bit more as He was, is, a Comms Lawyer, previously with the Commission. What say Phil, would you like to climb out on this limb? FCC Rules, Part 97.113 (Prohibited Transmissions)): (4) Music using a phone emission except as specifically provided elsewhere in this section; communications intended to facilitate a criminal act; messages encoded for the purpose of obscuring their meaning, except as otherwise provided herein; obscene or indecent words or language; or false or deceptive messages, signals or identification. There is no exception for transmission of medical or emergency data. Doesn't seem that it could be any clearer. White papers don't override the rules and regs. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. ================== |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 20:14:35 EST, Jerry Stuckle
wrote: There is no exception for transmission of medical or emergency data. Doesn't seem that it could be any clearer. White papers don't override the rules and regs. "White papers" when issued by the FCC explain how they intend to apply/interpret/enforce the rules, and are persuasive authority in cases of litigation thereof. Sometimes they make it easier, sometimes they make it more stringent than "black letter" rules. We use a ton of those in procedural cases of waiver requests. 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane ARRL Volunteer Counsel |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/27/2013 7:14 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
There is no exception for transmission of medical or emergency data. http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/faq/safeguards/197.html Specifically: For example, the Privacy Rule does not require the following types of structural or systems changes: Encryption of wireless or other emergency medical radio communications which can be intercepted by scanners. Jeff-1.0 wa6fwi |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/27/2013 10:50 PM, Foxs Mercantile wrote:
On 1/27/2013 7:14 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: There is no exception for transmission of medical or emergency data. http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/faq/safeguards/197.html Specifically: For example, the Privacy Rule does not require the following types of structural or systems changes: Encryption of wireless or other emergency medical radio communications which can be intercepted by scanners. Jeff-1.0 wa6fwi "Emergency" is the defining word here. And when you look up the definition, it refers to a threat of an immediate loss of life. This exception was implemented to allow Life Flight helicopters, Ambulances, etc. to be able to communicate with the hospital. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. ================== |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Providing emergency communications | Shortwave | |||
decentralized emergency communications | Policy | |||
FA: HAM/EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS VAN "NICE" | Swap | |||
FA: Ham-Emergency Communications Van | Swap | |||
FA: Ham/Emergency Communications Van-NICE | Swap |