Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 This is from a web-site that is replaying Usenet, including net.ham-radio, from 30 years ago (currently early 1986). The site is: http://www.olduse.net If you prefer to use your own newsreader, the site also supports an NNTP connection at: nntp.olduse.net:119 From net.ham-radio Tue Feb 2 14:55:10 2016 Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site inuxi.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!bellcore!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ih np4!inuxc!inuxi!wheatley From: (Steven Wheatley) Newsgroups: net.ham-radio Subject: ARRL BULLETIN 8 (automatic control of digital operation above 50 mhz) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 31-Jan-86 11:02:08 EST Article-I.D.: inuxi.281 Posted: Fri Jan 31 11:02:08 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 13-Feb-86 07:28:47 EST Distribution: net Organization: AT&T Consumer Products, Indianapolis Lines: 29 Xref: dummy dummy:1 X-OldUsenet-Modified: added Xref qst de k9eui hr arrl bulletin nr 8 from arrl headquarters newington ct january 23, 1986 to all radio amateurs bt fcc has released a report and order in pr docket 85 105 allowing automatic control for digital operation on frequencies 50 mhz and above. automatic control privileges continue for repeater, auxiliary and beacon operation. the new privileges are effective march 1986. there is a dark lining in this silver cloud. a major goal in the securing of automatic control privileges for digital operation at 50 mhz and above had been the facilitation of packet radio data transfer, computer to computer communication and packet switching systems. such operation has continued to be hampered by the requirement that a control operator be present when third party traffic is handled. fcc has provided no relief in this quarter in its report and order in pr docket 85 105. fcc found that neither the speed with which a message is transmitted, nor the operating mode, justified any deviation from the rule requiring that the control operator of an amateur station be present at the control point whenever a station engages in third party traffic. under these circumstances, the expanded automatic control privileges gained through 85 105 may be a hollow victory. arrl response to this apparent setback for packet radio is scheduled for discussion at the january arrl board meeting, in progress at this writing. watch w1aw and qst for further details ar Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!g From: (Bob Clements) Newsgroups: net.ham-radio Subject: FCC & Automatic control (long but important) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 26-Jan-86 00:41:02 EST Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.1999 Posted: Sun Jan 26 00:41:02 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 30-Jan-86 01:10:37 EST Sender: Lines: 256 Xref: dummy dummy:1 X-OldUsenet-Modified: added Xref Before the PR Federal Communications Commission FCC 86-18 Washington DC 20554 36413 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Part 97 of the ) PR Docket No. 85-105 Commission's Rules to permit ) automatic control of amateur ) RM-4879 radio stations. ) _REPORT AND ORDER_ Adopted: January 13, 1986; Released: January 16, 1986 By the Commission: 1. On April 5, 1985, the Commission adopted a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (50 F.R. 15196; April 17, 1985) to permit any amateur station to be under automatic control provided that operation was on frequencies above 29.5 MHz and that no third-party traffic was transmitted. This was an expansion of the proposal requested by The American Radio Relay League, Inc. (ARRL), who had requested automatic control only for stations transmitting digital communications while operating on frequencies above 30 MHz. Nineteen comments and one reply comment were filed in this proceeding. (1) 2. Our Notice of Proposed Rule Making in this proceeding, _supra_, particularly invited amateur radio operators experienced in automatic control to submit comments on the practicality of expanding automatic control to encompass all amateur operations, not just digital communications. Such comments were not forthcoming. Because of the lack of user support, we will adopt only the ARRL's recommendation to limit automatic control to digital communications on very high frequencies (VHF) and above. (We select 50 MHz rather than 30 MHz, as the petitioner requests, because there are no amateur frequencies between 29.7 and 50 MHz). ________ (1) Comments filed by the American Radio Relay League, Inc., (ARRL), Robert C. Clements, Jess de la Cuesta and Joseph Anthony Wolos were filed late. Consideration of the viewpoints expressed in those comments will aid in the resolution of this proceeding. Therefore, we accept them. __________________________________________________ ______________________ (Page 2) 3. In the Notice, _supra_, we reminded amateur operators that the current rules require the presence of the control operator at the station control point whenever third-party traffic is being transmitted. We emphasized that the proposed amendments would still prohibit automatic control of the station when it is transmitting third-party traffic. Some commenters were confused about unsupervised third-party traffic. For example, repeater stations are already permitted to be operated under automatic control. However, as with any amateur station, when they are transmitting third-party traffic, the control operator must be present at the control point monitoring and supervising the transmissions. 4. Many of the commenters request that high-speed digital operating modes, such as packet-switching, bulletin boards, computer based message systems and electronic mailboxes be exempt from the requirement that the control operator supervise third-party traffic. They believe that the third-party rules as applied to such high-speed digital communications are impracticable and would, in effect, nullify the advantages of automatic control. To acquiesce in that request would be inconsistent with other types of amateur operation. Third-party traffic is radio communications on behalf of anyone other than the control operator.(2) Neither the speed at which the message is transmitted nor the emission mode (voice, telegraphy, digital etc.) changes its character. This was pointed out in our letter of October 19, 1978, to Richard L. Baldwin, then General Manager of the ARRL.(3) In that letter, we reiterated that unsupervised third-party traffic by amateur stations is not permitted. 5. Some comments suggest that the third-party traffic rules be amended so that they would be applicable only at the time the third-party traffic is first introduced into the amateur communications system. However, screening the message content at its introduction does not change the character of the traffic. It is still third-party traffic which must be closely regulated in the non-common carrier Amateur service. Otherwise, amateur facilities and frequencies would be open to non-amateurs and could eclipse other amateur uses. Moreover, we are also concerned about the final destination of the message. We do not want to give our approbation to a mechanism which could be used to circumvent the international Radio Regulations which forbid exchange of amateur third-party traffic between countries who are not parties to agreements permitting such traffic. ______ (2) Section 97.3(v). (3) FCC 78-742; 70 F.C.C. 2d 1303. See also News Release No. 2028, October 25, 1978. __________________________________________________ ________________________ (page 3) International third-party radio communications are prohibited by Section 97.114 of the amateur rules and Article 32, number 2733 of the International Radio Regulations (Geneva, 1979), except where arrangements have been made between the two countries involved, Article 32, number 2734. 6. Some commenters suggest that MF and HF frequencies between 1.8 and 29.5 MHz be added to the frequencies available for automatic control or that automatic control be extended at least to all digital communications below 29.5 MHz on a regular basis or by temporary special authority (STA). They state that coast-to-coast coverage for point-to-point message handling would be accommodated by including MF and HF frequencies. Because of the possibility of congestion on the MF and HF frequencies, we do not believe that it would be advisable to permit automatic control on those frequencies. 7. Robert C. Clements is under the impression that we inserted a clarification into the proposed Section 97.79 (b) that the station licensee is presumed to be the control operator of the station, unless there is documentation to the contrary. However, this is essentially the same as the present wording of Section 97.79(b). The words "at all times" will be deleted from this rule in order to be consistent with the revised wording of Section 97.3(m)(3). 8. For the reasons given herein, we amend our rules to permit automatic control only for digital communications on amateur frequencies 50 MHz and above. Further, we affirm our present rule that requires the control operator to be present at the control point whenever the station is engaging in third-party traffic. 9. IT IS ORDERED, That Part 97 is amended as set forth in the Appendix hereto. This action is taken pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4 (i) and 303 (r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That these rule amendments shall become effective, March 14, 1986. 11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That the Secretary shall cause a copy of this Report and Order to be published in the Federal Register. 12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That this proceeding is terminated. __________________________________________________ ________________________ (Page 4) 13. Information in this matter may be obtained by contacting Maurice J. DePont, (202) 632-4964. Private Radio Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William J. Tricarico Secretary Attachment: Appendix __________________________________________________ ________________________ (Page 5) _APPENDIX_ Part 97 of Chapter 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended, as follows: 1. The authority citation for Part 97 continues to read as follows: Authority citation: 48 Stat. 1066, 1082, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 154, 303. 2. Section 97.3 (m) (3) is amended to read: Sec 97.3 Definitions. * * * * (m) * * * (1) * * * (2) * * * (3) _Automatic control_ means the use of devices and procedures for control without the control operator being present at the control point when the station is transmitting. 3. Section 97.79 (b) is amended to read: Sec 97.79 Control operator requirements. * * * * (b) Every amateur radio station, when transmitting, must have a control operator. The control operator must be present at the control point of the station, except when the station is transmitting under automatic control. The control operator must be a licensed amateur radio operator or permittee designated by the station licensee. The control operator and the station licensee are both responsible for the proper operation of the station. For purposes of enforcement of the rules of this part, the FCC will presume that the station licensee is the control operator of the station, unless documentation to the contrary exists. __________________________________________________ ________________________ (Page 6) 4. Section 97.69 is amended by adding a new paragraph (d), as follows: Sec. 97.69 Digital communications. * * * * (d) An amateur station may be under automatic control when transmitting digital communications on frequencies 50 MHz and above. 5. A new section 97.80 is added, as follows: Sec. 97.80 Operation under automatic control. (a) When under automatic control, devices must be installed and procedures must be implemented which will ensure compliance with the rules when the control operator is not present at the control point of the amateur station. (b) No amateur station may be operated under automatic control while transmitting third-party traffic. (c) Automatic control of an amateur station must cease upon notification by the Engineer-in-Charge of a Commission field office that the station is transmitting improperly or causing harmful interference to other stations. Automatic operation must not be resumed without prior approval of the Engineer-in-Charge. 6. Section 97.114 is amended by adding a new subparagraph (4) to paragraph (b) as follows: Sec. 97.114 Third-party traffic. * * * * (b) * * * (4) Third-party traffic from an amateur station under automatic control. * * * * __________________________________________________ ________________________ [The above copy retyped for distribution by Bob Clements, K1BC, from the FCC text as obtained from ARRL. 25 January 1986.] Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 Unisoft-Cosmos; site kepler.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zet a!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!amdcad!lll-crg!well!micropro!kepler!mojo From: (Morris Jones) Newsgroups: net.ham-radio Subject: FCC & Automatic control (long but important) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29-Jan-86 21:09:26 EST Article-I.D.: kepler.471 Posted: Wed Jan 29 21:09:26 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 1-Feb-86 03:36:11 EST References: Reply-To: (Morris Jones) Organization: MicroPro Int'l Corp., San Rafael, CA Lines: 19 Summary: This is important! Xref: dummy dummy:1 X-OldUsenet-Modified: added Xref This Report and Order states in no uncertain terms that third-party traffic may not be handled without a control operator present. But what really struck home was the iteration of Part 97, "third party traffic is traffic on behalf of anyone but the control operator." That DOES NOT make an exception for traffic that originates from another amateur radio operator. That means no mailboxes, no RBBS, no network news reading without a system control operator monitoring. It's getting harder and harder to play by the rules. Mojo, AA4KB - -- Mojo .... Morris Jones, MicroPro Product Development {lll-crg,ptsfa,dual,well,pyramid}!micropro!kepler!mojo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAla2QZUACgkQ6Pj0az779o6c6ACdHJhVGWZIJp w0/F/+5cOx1L+l U9wAn08w+1ZWEJugiuZ+tIpW+hegZf2r =n8Bk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Report & Order Posted! | Policy | |||
FCC BPL Report and Order Stresses Avoidance, Resolution of Harmful Interference | Broadcasting | |||
FCC BPL Report and Order Stresses Avoidance, Resolution of Harmful Interference | Shortwave | |||
FCC to Act on BPL Report and Order | Broadcasting | |||
FCC to Act on BPL Report and Order | Shortwave |