Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nada Tapu wrote in
: On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:07:15 -0500, "wa0kbz" wrote: Glen Don't know if I 100% agree with your code speeds but I do thing the NO Code should be for 1 year and none renewable. I had to take my license in front of the FCC and not so VE who may or may not help you out to get a license. As I am a big VHFer I don't know how these NO Code guys are going to understand beacons. They are all code and most at 10 ~ 20 wpm. I guess the next thing will be, they will want all beacons either digital or voice. YUK! Not up in the GHZ range yet but maybe some day. 73, Bill, WA0KBZ Right on, Bill! Thanks for your thoughts. NT It's funny, and most telling. The no-code hams have everything over 30 MHz, but it's the code hams that are the one's moving ham radio forward and doing anything technical wise. I guess the no-coders are still trying to figure things out. SC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Slow Code wrote:
It's funny, and most telling. The no-code hams have everything over 30 MHz, but it's the code hams that are the one's moving ham radio forward and doing anything technical wise. If that's true, it's certainly a change from half a century ago when we HF hams observed the VHF/UHF hams revolutionizing amateur radio with their technical expertise. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message m... Slow Code wrote: It's funny, and most telling. The no-code hams have everything over 30 MHz, but it's the code hams that are the one's moving ham radio forward and doing anything technical wise. If that's true, it's certainly a change from half a century ago when we HF hams observed the VHF/UHF hams revolutionizing amateur radio with their technical expertise. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Not at all. As usual, SC is again proving he is a bitter little man. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote in
m: Slow Code wrote: It's funny, and most telling. The no-code hams have everything over 30 MHz, but it's the code hams that are the one's moving ham radio forward and doing anything technical wise. If that's true, it's certainly a change from half a century ago when we HF hams observed the VHF/UHF hams revolutionizing amateur radio with their technical expertise. And half a century ago those VHF/UHF hams had passed a code test. They weren't no-coders, they were motivated and did what it took. Today's no-codes aren't motivated and don't want to make an effort, therefore they're probably not going to be motivated to move things forward either. SC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:11:42 GMT, Slow Code spake
thusly: Cecil Moore wrote in om: Slow Code wrote: It's funny, and most telling. The no-code hams have everything over 30 MHz, but it's the code hams that are the one's moving ham radio forward and doing anything technical wise. If that's true, it's certainly a change from half a century ago when we HF hams observed the VHF/UHF hams revolutionizing amateur radio with their technical expertise. And half a century ago those VHF/UHF hams had passed a code test. They weren't no-coders, they were motivated and did what it took. Today's no-codes aren't motivated and don't want to make an effort, therefore they're probably not going to be motivated to move things forward either. Your defamation is well noted. Democracy just sucks, doesn't it? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Slow Code wrote:
And half a century ago those VHF/UHF hams had passed a code test. They weren't no-coders, they were motivated and did what it took. Today's no-codes aren't motivated and don't want to make an effort, therefore they're probably not going to be motivated to move things forward either. Actually, the Technician License was offered with reduced code requirements for hams who were more interested in technical experimentation than in ragchewing. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil Moore wrote: Slow Code wrote: It's funny, and most telling. The no-code hams have everything over 30 MHz, but it's the code hams that are the one's moving ham radio forward and doing anything technical wise. If that's true, it's certainly a change from half a century ago when we HF hams observed the VHF/UHF hams revolutionizing amateur radio with their technical expertise. Uhhhhhhhh...Cecil...??!?! Did you actually make that up, or just quote someone else who is equally ill informed? Most of the people who were "moving forward" half a century ago were ALSO folks who were active on and well known in HF circles... Unless, of course, you're now going to take Lennie's spin and tell us that any / everything reported in QST, CQ, etc, was only "self-serviing rhetoric"...?!?! Try again. Steve, K4YZ |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 01:08:42 GMT, Slow Code spake
thusly: wrote in oups.com: Cecil Moore wrote: Slow Code wrote: It's funny, and most telling. The no-code hams have everything over 30 MHz, but it's the code hams that are the one's moving ham radio forward and doing anything technical wise. If that's true, it's certainly a change from half a century ago when we HF hams observed the VHF/UHF hams revolutionizing amateur radio with their technical expertise. Uhhhhhhhh...Cecil...??!?! Did you actually make that up, or just quote someone else who is equally ill informed? Most of the people who were "moving forward" half a century ago were ALSO folks who were active on and well known in HF circles... Unless, of course, you're now going to take Lennie's spin and tell us that any / everything reported in QST, CQ, etc, was only "self-serviing rhetoric"...?!?! Try again. Steve, K4YZ Anyone that puts out an argument to keep the code requirement gets teased by Cecil. He loves to throw out some goof-ball counter reply to try to be-little the original argument. Pot, meet kettle. -- (Jim, single dad to Lesleigh [Autistic] 04/20/94) "What, Me Worry?" A. E. Newman Please note: All unsolicited e-mail sent to me may, at my discretion, be posted in this newsgroup verbatim. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Opus- wrote in
: On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 01:08:42 GMT, Slow Code spake thusly: wrote in roups.com: Cecil Moore wrote: Slow Code wrote: It's funny, and most telling. The no-code hams have everything over 30 MHz, but it's the code hams that are the one's moving ham radio forward and doing anything technical wise. If that's true, it's certainly a change from half a century ago when we HF hams observed the VHF/UHF hams revolutionizing amateur radio with their technical expertise. Uhhhhhhhh...Cecil...??!?! Did you actually make that up, or just quote someone else who is equally ill informed? Most of the people who were "moving forward" half a century ago were ALSO folks who were active on and well known in HF circles... Unless, of course, you're now going to take Lennie's spin and tell us that any / everything reported in QST, CQ, etc, was only "self-serviing rhetoric"...?!?! Try again. Steve, K4YZ Anyone that puts out an argument to keep the code requirement gets teased by Cecil. He loves to throw out some goof-ball counter reply to try to be-little the original argument. Pot, meet kettle. No. All my arguments are good sound arguments. SC |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | Policy | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | CB |